Differences between clicker and voice when used as event markers in shaping novel behaviors in dog training

Main Article Content

Minerva Vanegas Farfano

Abstract

The principles of operant conditioning are often applied in canine training. Their correct application requires a good timing, well-defined criteria and a proper rate of reinforcement. Few studies have compared the types of markers of canine training events; the most used are the clicker and the voice. Objective: to compare the number of reinforcers required to shape seven new behaviors in two canine subjects, contrasting the use of the clicker and the voice as markers of events. Results: there is evidence of equivalence in the number of reinforcers needed to achieve the behavior to shape with the use of the clicker and the use of the voice. Conclusions: at least in this study, the timing and the shaping are not affected by the type of marker of events used.

Keywords:
Timing, clicker, operant conditioning, markers of events and shaping

References

Blandina, A. (2010). To click or not to click: The impact of positive reinforcement methods on the acquisition of behavior. (Unpublished honours thesis), University of Florida. United States. Retrived from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=blandina+clicker&btnG=&as_sdt=1,4&as_sdtp=

Browne, C. M., Starkey, N. J., Foster, M. T., & McEwan, J. S. (2011). Timing of reinforcement during dog training. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 6, 58-59. doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2010.09.058

Browne, C. M., Starkey, N. J., Foster, M. T., & McEwan, J. S. (2013). Delayed reinforcement does it affect learning? Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 8, 37-38. doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2013.04.039

Coren, S. (2006). The intelligence of dogs. London: Pocket Books.

Donaldson, J. (1996). The culture clash. Berkeley: James and Kenneth Publishers.

Fukuzawa, M., & Hayashi, N. (2013). Comparison of three different reinforcements of learning in dogs (Canis familiaris). Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 8, 221-224. doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2013.04.067

Hiby, E. F., Rooney, N. J., & Bradshaw, J. W. S. (2004). Dog training methods: Their use, effectiveness and interaction with behavior and welfare. Animal Welfare, 13, 63-69.

Martin, G., & Pear, J. (2007). Modificación de conducta. Qué es y cómo aplicarla. [Behavior modification. What it is and how it is used]. Madrid: Pearson.

Mills, D. S. (1997). Using learning theory in animal behaviour therapy practice. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, 27, 617-635.

Pryor, K. (2009). Reaching the animal mind: Clicker training and what it teaches us about all animals. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Skinner, B. F. (1951). How to teach animals. Scientific American, 185, 26-29.

Smith, S. M., & Davis, E. S. (2008). Clicker increases resistance to extinction but does not decrease training time of a simple operant task in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Applied Animal Behavior Science, 110, 318-329. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2007.04.012

Williams, J. L., Friend, T. H., Nevill, C. H., & Archer, G. (2004). The efficacy of a secondary reinforcer (clicker) during acquisition and extinction of an operant task in horses. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 88, 331–341. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2004.03.008

Wood, L. (2007). Clicker bridging stimulus efficacy. New York: Hunter College.

Yamamoto, M., Kikusui, T., & Ohta, M. (2009). Influence of delayed timing of owners' actions on the behaviors of their dogs, Canis familiaris. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 4, 11-18. doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2008.08.006

Yin, S. (2009). Low stress handling, restraint, and behaviour modification of dogs. Davis: Cattledog Publishing.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.