Subjective or objective responsibility in the administrative penalty procedure in peruvian legislation
Article Sidebar
How to Cite
Downloads
Societal impact
Main Article Content
Abstract
One of these powers granted by the legal system to the State as a subject of law is the ius puniendi, which is the right that empowers the state to punish or punish the administration that incurs a breach of the provisions of the legal system, using of his faculty of Imperium and managing to guarantee through his control an adequate social coexistence.
The purpose of this research is to establish a critique of the responsibility established in the Peruvian system, applying an analytical methodology.
The sanctioning administrative procedure starts from the conception that the State is an entity in which a considerable number of powers converge, that when exercised as indicated by the legal norm, will generate in all the administered an erga omnes effect.
Article Details
References
Álvarez Londoño, L. F. (2000) La historia del derecho internacional público. Bogotá: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.
Baca Oneto, V. S. (2014) ¿Responsabilidad subjetiva u objetiva en materia sancionatoria? Una propuesta de respuesta a partir del ordenamiento peruano. Recuperado de http://www.mpfn.gob.pe/escuela/contenido/actividades/docs/2271_responsabilidad_subjetiva_u_objetiva_en_materia_sancionadora.pdf
Boden, R., Gummett, P., Cox, D. & Barker, K. (1998) New Public Management and the Funding of Science and Technology Services To The UK Government. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 11(3), pp. 267-291.
Broadbent, J. & Laughlin, R. (1998) Absorption and Absorbing Groups in Schools and GP Practices in the UK. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 11(3), pp. 403-435.
Coninck-Smith, N. (1991) Restructuring for Efficiency in the Public Sector. McKinsey Quarterly, 4, pp. 133-150.
Dunleavy, P.J. & Hood, C. (1994). From Old Public Administration to New Public Management. Public Money and Management, 14, pp. 9-16.
Guilherme Marinoni, L. (2007) Derecho fundamental a la tutela jurisdiccional efectiva. Lima: Palestra editores.
Hurtado Reyes, M. (2006) Tutela jurisdiccional diferenciada. Volumen 11 de Tesis & monografías. Lima: Palestra Editores.
Ladner, A. (1999) Riforme comunali- tra efficienza e legittimazione, Riassunto del rapporto di ricerca. Riforme comunali.
Leeuw, F.L. (1996) Performance auditing, new public management and performance improvement. Question and answers. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(2), 92-102.
Machicado, J. (2008). Carta Magna de Juan sin Tierra. Recuperado de http://www.oocities.org/eqhd/cm_files/cm.pdf
María Casal, J. Zerpa Morloy, M. (2007) Tendencias actuales del Derecho Procesal. Caracas: Editorial Universidad Católica Andrés Bello.
Martin Tirado, R. (2013) Procedimiento administrativo sancionador en materia de contratación pública. Derecho al debido proceso en sede administrativa y protección constitucional para el ejercicio de la función arbitral. Revista Ius et Praxis, 44, pp. 143-191.
Montesinos Julve, V. (1999) El cambio de la cultura organizativa de las Administraciones Públicas y el presupuesto. Análisis local, 27, pp. 71-80.