La transformación de la OTAN a través de los conceptos estratégicos y la ampliación

JUAN DAVID  GARCÍA RAMÍREZ

PDF (Spanish)

Published: 2014-06-15

How to Cite

GARCÍA RAMÍREZ, J. D. . (2014). The transformation of NATO through strategic and expansion concepts. Analecta política, 4(6), 81-98. https://revistas.upb.edu.co/index.php/analecta/article/view/2664

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Societal impact

JUAN DAVID GARCÍA RAMÍREZ

Pontifical Bolivarian University

Abstract

This paper aims to explain the moment of transformation and update of NATO’s ob- jectives, capacities and means to reach their goals. NATO is a crucial actor of political stability in the Euro-Atlantic region and has a high influence on international securi- ty, as it is aware of international relations evolution. This organization redefines itself according to a set of new functions and, commits to its foundational principles and values. Therefore, NATO acts with more resolution and efficiency against issues such as international terrorism, nuclear proliferation, copyright violations and drug trafficking; and, develops new international cooperation mechanisms with other states and international organizations.

Keywords:

International organization, war, international conflict, collective security, democracy

Author Biography

JUAN DAVID GARCÍA RAMÍREZ, Pontifical Bolivarian University

Politólogo, candidato a Magíster en Estudios Políticos de la Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana y profesor de la Facultad de Ciencias Políticas de la misma Universidad. Pertenece al Grupo de Investigación en Estudios Políticos de la Facultad de Ciencias Políticas de la Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana. Medellín-Colombia.

References

Axworthy, L. (1999). NATO’s New Security Vocation. NATO Review, 47 (4), 8-11. Recupe- rado de http://www.nato.int/docu/review/1999/9904-02.htm

Duignan, P. (2000). NATO: Its Past, Present and Future. Stanford (CA): Hoover Institution Press.

Goldgeier, J. (2010). The Future of NATO. Council on Foreign Relations. Council Special Report, 51, 1-23.

Heidelberg Institute for International Conflict Research. (2012). Conflict Barometer 2012. Heidelberg: University of Heidelberg Press Office.

Huntington, S. (1997). El choque de civilizaciones y la reconfiguración del orden mundial.

Barcelona: Paidós.

International Business Publications. (2010). NATO Handbook: Structure, Policy, Contacts. Brussels: NATO Graphics & Printing.

Kaplan, R. (2012). The Revenge of Geography: What the Map tells us about Coming Con-

flicts and the Battle Against Fate. New York: Random House.

Kegley, C. (2009). World Politics: Trend and Transformation. Florence (KY): Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Kolodziej, E. (2005). Security and International Relations. New York: Cambridge Univer- sity Press.

Kupchan, C. (2012). A Still Strong Alliance. Policy Review, 172, 58-70.

Laqueur, W. (1999).The New Terrorism: Fanaticism and the Arms of Mass Destruction. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.

Mandelbaum, M. (1999). A Perfect Failure: NATO’s War Against Yugoslavia. Foreign Affairs, 78 (5), 3-5.

Moore, R. (2007). NATO’s New Mission. Projecting Stability in a Post Cold War World.

Westport (CT): Praeger Security International.

NATO Public Diplomacy Division. (1991).The Alliance’s New Strategic Concept. Brussels: NATO Graphics & Printing.

Orfy, M. (2011).NATO and the Middle East: The Geopolitical Context Post 9/11. New York: Routledge Studies in Middle East Politics, Routledge.

Szayna, T. (2001).NATO Enlargement 2000-2015: Determinants and Implications for De- fense Planning and Shaping. Santa Monica (CA): RAND, Rand Corporation.

Yost, D. (2010). NATO’s evolving purposes and the next Strategic Concept. International Affairs, 86 (2), 489-522.

Article Sidebar