The American foreign policy for Latin America in the period 2001-2014
Main Article Content
Abstract
The paper analyzes the behavior of the United States, particularly its status as an international power in charge of maintaining order and international security, during the transition between the governments of George Bush and Barack Obama. fte political tradition states that the country should maintain a strong position in order to safeguard equilibrium in the international system. However, two confronting theories emerge when it comes to resolving a dilemma of international character. On one hand, Mearsheimer, offensive realism theorist, proposes a context in which states are always in competition due to the existence of an unbalanced international system; the liberal trend leaded by Ikemberry. On the other hand, notes that the liberal international order, proposed by the United States, should not be defined as a scheme of radical competition but quite the opposite, namely, a space for international cooperation aiming to reduce international tension. Is in this latter frame that the United States could set a course of action regarding Latin America.
Article Details
References
Art, R. (1991). A defensible Defense: America´s Grand Strategy after the Cold War. Inter- national Security, 5 (4), 5-53. Recuperado de: http://www.jstor.orge/stable/2539010
Benavides, L. (2009). El régimen internacional del “nuevo humanitarismo”. Revista aca- démica cuatrimestral de publicación electrónica. Grupo de Estudios de Relaciones Internacionales (GERI). Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, España. (12). [ www.rela-
cionesinternacionales.info].
Ferguson, N. (2005). Coloso. Auge y Decadencia del Imperio Norteamericano. Madrid: Debate.
Fontaine, R., Lord, K. (2012). America’s Path: Grand Strategy for the Next Administration. Center for a New American Security. Recuperado de http://www.cnas.org/americas- path
Hakim, P. (2006). Is Washington Losing Latin America? Foreign Affairs, 85 (1), 39-53.Re- cuperado de [http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/61372/peter-hakim/is-wash- ington-losing-latin-america]
Ikenberry, J. (2011). Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ikenberry, J. (2005). Power and liberal order: America’s postwar world order in transi- tion. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 5, 133–152. Recuperado de http:// irap.oxfordjournals.org/content/5/2/133.full
Lowenthal, A. (2009). Renewing Cooperation in the Americas. En Lowenthal, A., Piccone, T., Whitehead, L. (Eds.), The Obama Administration and the Americas. Agenda for change (1-21). Washington D.C: Brookings Institution Press.
Miller, P. (2012). Five Pillars of American Grand Strategy. The International Institute for Strategic Studies, pp. 7-44. Recuperado de [http://www.iiss.org/-/media/Silos/Sur- vival/2012/Survival--Global-Politics-and-Strategy-October-November-2012/54- 5-02-Miller/54-5-02-Miller.pdf
Nye, J., Donahue, J. (2000). Governance in a Globalizing world. Harrisonburg (VA): Brookings Institution Press.
Nye, J., Donahue, J. (1990). Soft Power. Foreign Policy, 80, pp. 153-172. Recuperado de http://faculty.maxwell.syr.edu/rdenever/PPA-730-27/Nye%201990.pdf
Rusell, R. (2006). América Latina para Estados Unidos: ¿especial, desdeñable, codiciada o perdida? Nueva Sociedad, 206. Recuperado de http://www.nuso.org/upload/arti- culos/3394_1.pdf
Seymour, R. (2006). Are the neocons slipping into extinction? The Middle East.
Stewart, R., Frazier, D. (2012). Regional Power and Security Orders. A theoretical Frame- work. New York: Routledge.
The White House. (2002). The National Security Strategy of the United States of Ameri- ca. Recuperado de: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/63562.pdf
The White House. (2010). The National Security Strategy of the United States of Amer- ica. Recuperado de: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/na- tional_security_strategy.pdf
Viottí, P. y Kauppi, M. V. (2007). International Relations and World Politics. Security, eco- nomy, Identity. United States of America: Pearson Prentice Hall.
