Holo-polo, or the sweet tales of the Holocaust
Article Sidebar
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Downloads
Societal impact
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article describes the phenomenon of editorial kitsch trends around the Holocaust literature and its impact on the Holocaust memory. "Holo-polo" is a way of dealing with the “discomfort” of the horrors of war and violence, by creating a more comfortable version of it. The article problematizes the ways of representation of a frequently debated and controversial issue, the Holocaust. By analyzing individual publications, the article addresses the issues of memory, forgetting, objectivity and truth of historical representation, and, inevitably, the ethical issue of historical fiction. The article argues that embellishing the history of the Holocaust is not only inappropriate, but also indecent. Instead of describing the horrors of the Holocaust, Holo-polo trivializes and misrepresents its significance, depicting melancholy, sentiment, and nostalgia in the light of a pop-cultural emotional trap. Or maybe is it just being moved by our own emotions. Kitschy clichés are misused and certainly do not serve memory, literature, or respect for Holocaust victims and survivors.
Article Details
References
Adorno, T. (1983). Prisms. MIT Press.
Assmann, A. (2013). Między historią a pamięcią. WUW.
Borys, M. (2019). Polski bajer. Disco polo i lata 90. W.A.B.
Buryła, S., Krawczyńska, D., Leociak, J. (2020). Polish Literature and the Holocaust (1939– 1968). Peter Lang Verlag.
Chutnik, S. (2008). Kieszonkowy atlas kobiet. HaArt.
Dębowski, P. (2020). Facebook post. March 2. https://www.facebook.com/przemekde- bowski.prace/photos/a.265903870168133/2827138034044691/
Foer, J., Thuras, D., Morton, E. (2016). Atlas Obscura: A Explorer's Guide to the World’s Hidden Wonders. Workman Publishing Company.
National Library of Israel's Hidden Stalag” Collection. https://www.atlasobscura.com/ places/national-library-of-israel-s-hidden-stalag-collection
Hirsch, A., Lanicek, J., Mitschke, S., Shields, K. (2019). “The Tattooist of Auschwitz and the trivialization of the Holocaust: A Roundtable Discussion”. Australian Association for Jewish Studies XXXII, pp. 2-20.
Hirsch, M. (2019). “Connective Arts of Postmemory”. Analecta Politica, 9 (16), pp.171- 176.
Hirsch, M. (1992). Family Pictures: Maus, Mourning, and Post-Memory. Discourse, 15 (2), pp. 3–29. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41389264.
Krall, H. (2020). „Nieprzyzwoitość formy”. Polityka, 37, 3278, p. 80.
Kurz, I., Kowalska-Leder, J., Szpakowska, M., Dobrosielski, P. (2017). Ślady Holocaustu w imaginarium kultury polskiej. Krytyka Polityczna.
LaCapra, D. (1994). Representing the Holocaust. History, Theory, Trauma, Cornell Uni- versity Press.
Lang, B. (2009). Ja sam uszedłem, by ci o tym donieść, czyli filozoficzne dawanie świadectwa”. Teksty Drugie 3, pp.163-176.
Lang, B. (2003). Holocaust Representation: Art within the Limits of History and Ethics.
Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lehrer, E. (2019). Od „społeczności dziedzictwa kulturowego” do „społeczności uwikłania” in Różnicowanie narodowego “my” Kuratorskie marzenia. WUJ, pp. 57-72.
Linenthal, E. (1995). Preserving Memory: The Struggle to Create America’s Holocaust Museum. Columbia University Press.
Shankman, H. (2019). “Trivializing the Holocaust?”. Jewish Book Council. https://www. jewishbookcouncil.org/pb-daily/trivializing-the-holocaust.
Sobolewska, J. (2020). „Kiczowaty kostium Zagłady”. Polityka 6 (3247), p. 82.
Szot, W. (2020). Nowe opowieści o Zagładzie. Miesięcznik Znak, 11 (786), pp. 94-101.
Witek-Malicka, W. (2018). “Fact-checking „The Tattooist of Auschwitz””. Memoria. Me-
mory. History. Education 11 (14), pp. 6-17.
Young, J. E. (1983). Writing and Rewriting the Holocaust: narrative and the consequences of interpretation. Indiana University.