Stronger Together: The 2017 Earthquake in Mexico as a Catalyst for Collective Action
Article Sidebar
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Societal impact
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To examine how social identity and observing of social support influence solidarity and collective efficacy after the 2017 earthquake in Mexico. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 100 students from the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM in Spanish), using the Drury et al. (2016) tool and open-ended questions. Data were collected through online questionnaires. Results: Social identity significantly predicts emotional, coordinated support, and collective efficacy. Observing acts of support encourages prosocial behaviors and greater personal and community resilience. Conclusions: Social identity and observing support are crucial for promoting solidarity and community resilience. The study highlights the importance of strategies that strengthen these factors for adequate recovery and community empowerment. It is recommended that public policies that reinforce social identity and community organization be implemented to improve disaster response.
Article Details
References
Adler Lomnitz, L. (1999). La gran familia como unidad de solidaridad en México / The great family as solidarity unit in Mexico. Revista Psiquiátrica (Santiago de Chile), 16(4), 203–210.
Allier, E. (2018). Memorias imbricadas: terremotos en México, 1985 y 2017. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 80, 9–40. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=32158258002
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs.
Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. In Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 1–45). Cambridge University Press.
Bonanno, G. A., Brewin, C. R., Kaniasty, K. y La Greca, A. M. (2010). Weighing the costs of disaster: Consequences, risks, and resilience in individuals, families, and communities. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100610387086
Buechler, S. M. (1993). Beyond resource mobilization? Emerging trends in social movement theory. Sociological Quarterly, 34(2), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1993.tb00388.x
Carvacho, H., González, R., Cheyre, M., Rocha, C., Cornejo, M., Jiménez-Moya, G., Manzi, J., Álvarez-Dezerega, C., Álvarez, B., Castro, D., Varela, M., Valdenegro, D., Drury, J. y Livingstone, A. (2023). When social movements fail or succeed: Social psychological consequences of a collective
action’s outcome. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1155950
De Diputados, C., Congreso De, D. H. y Unión, L. A. (2014). Reglamento de la ley general de salud en materia de investigación para la salud.
https://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/regley/Reg_LGS_MIS.pdf
Drury, J. (2020). Recent developments in the psychology of crowds and collective behaviour. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 12–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.02.005
Drury, J., Brown, R., González, R. y Miranda, D. (2016). Emergent social identity and observing social support predict social support provided by survivors in a disaster: Solidarity in the 2010 Chile earthquake. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(2), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2146
Drury, J. y Reicher, S. (1999). The Intergroup dynamics of collective empowerment: Substantiating the social identity model of crowd behavior. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2(4), 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430299024005
Drury, J. y Reicher, S. (2009). Collective psychological empowerment as a model of social change: Researching crowds and power. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 707–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01622.x
Drury, J., Stancombe, J., Williams, R., Collins, H., Lagan, L., Barrett, A., French, P. y Chitsabesan, P. (2022). Survivors’ experiences of informal social support in coping and recovering after the 2017 Manchester Arena bombing. BJPsych Open, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2022.528
Dynes, R. R. (2003). Finding order in disorder: Continuities in the 9-11 Response. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 21, 9–23.
Farrow, K., Grolleau, G. y Ibanez, L. (2017). Social Norms and Pro-environmental Behavior: A Review of the Evidence. Ecological Economics, 140, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.017
Greijdanus, H., de Matos Fernandes, C. A., Turner-Zwinkels, F., Honari, A., Roos, C. A., Rosenbusch, H. y Postmes, T. (2020). The psychology of online activism and social movements: Relations between online and offline collective action. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 49–54.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.003
Hoerst, C. y Drury, J. (2023). The role of subjective power dynamics in far-right collective action: The “Unite the Right” rally and the capitol insurrection. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 11(1), 330–347. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.9951
Le Bon, G. (1985). The crowd: A study of the popular mind. Norman S. Berg.
Levin, K. A. (2006). Study design III: Cross-sectional studies. Evidence-Based Dentistry, 7(1), 24-25.
Lizzio-Wilson, M., Thomas, E. F., Louis, W. R., Wilcockson, B., Amiot, C. E., Moghaddam, F. M. y Mc-Garty, C. (2021). How collective-action failure shapes group heterogeneity and engagement in conventional and radical action over time. Psychological Science, 32(4), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620970562
Luce, A., Firth-Cozens, J., Midgley, S. y Burges, C. (2002). After the Omagh bomb: Posttraumatic stress disorder in health service staff. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 15(1), 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014327110402
Maya-Mondragón, J., Sánchez-Román, F. R., Palma-Zarco, A., Aguilar-Soto, M. y Borja-Aburto, V. H. (2019). Prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder and depression after the september 19th, 2017, earthquake in Mexico. Archives of Medical Research, 50(8), 502–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2019.11.008
Morris-Martin, A., De Vos, M. y Padget, J. (2019). Norm emergence in multiagent systems: a viewpoint paper. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 33(6), 706–749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-019-09422-0
Norris, F. H., Friedman, M. J., Watson, P. J., Byrne, C. M., Diaz, E. y Kaniasty, K. (2002). 60,000 disaster victims speak: Part I. An empirical review of the empirical literature, 1981-2001. Psychiatry, 65(3), 207–239.
Paton, D., McClure, J. y Buergelt, P. T. (2006). Natural hazard resilience: The role of individual and Household preparedness. En D. Paton & D. Johnston (Eds.), Disaster Resilience: An Integrated Approach (pp. 105–124). Charles C Thomas Pub Ltd.
Reicher, S. (2008). The psychology of crowd dynamics. En M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tintale (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes (pp. 182–208). Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470998458.ch8
Solnit, R. (2009). A paradise built in hell: The extraordinary communities that arise in disaster. Penguin Books.
Tajfel, H. (1972). Social categorization. English manuscript of “La catégorisation sociale.” En S. Moscovici (Ed.), Introduction à la psychologie sociale (Vol. 1, pp. 272–302). Larousse.
Tajfel, H. y Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. En S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Nelson-Hall.
Tedeschi, R. G. y Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1501_01
Tekin, S. y Drury, J. (2022). A critical discursive psychology approach to understanding how disaster victims are delegitimized by hostile Twitter posts: Racism, victim-blaming, and forms of attack following the Grenfell Tower fire. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 32(5), 908–922. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2596
Turner, J. C. (1975). Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 5–34.
Turner, J. C., Oakes, S., Haslam, S. A. y McGarty, C. (1994). Self and Collective: Cognition and social context. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 454-463.
Uysal, M. S., Saavedra, P. y Drury, J. (2024). Beyond normative and non-normative: A systematic review on predictors of confrontational collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12735
Vestergren, S., Drury, J. y Chiriac, E. H. (2018). How collective action produces psychological change and how that change endures over time: A case study of an environmental campaign. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(4), 855–877. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12270
Williams, R. y Drury, J. (2009). Psychosocial resilience and its influence on managing mass emergencies and disasters. Psychiatry, 8(8), 293–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mppsy.2009.04.019
Zeitz, K. M., Tan, H. M., Grief, M., Couns, P. C. y Zeitz, C. J. (2009). Crowd behavior at mass gatherings: A literature review. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 24(1), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X00006518