Historical-Critical Method in Philosophy

Main Article Content

Silvana Filippi

Abstract

The article describes the historical-critical method within the field of philosophy and the issues to which it is related, such as the role of the history of philosophy in the development of theoretical philosophy and the
distinction between historiography and history. First, it highlights the relevance of the historical-critical method for philosophy, which is based on the knowledge philosophers should have about the genesis of thinking. Then it analyzes the original sense of the method, understood as a search for historical, cultural, external, and internal factors that influence philosophical works. It, also, addresses history of philosophy as a rational reconstruction of previous doctrines. Finally, it considers the distinction between Historie and Geschichte, which comes from biblical studies, to evaluate the limitations to applying the historical-critical method. To sum up, the article goes from mere documentarism, as a primary form of preserving and recovering information about the progression of philosophical doctrines, through historiography, as a systematic undertaking for chronological ordering with the assistance of specific instruments, to history, as rational and critical reconstruction of thinking, and what in theology -but also in philosophy- is known as Geschichte, that is, the profound happening that provides the fabric of thinking with real meaning.

Keywords:
Methods, Philosophy, Texts, Genesis, Context, Criticism, Historiography, Reconstruction, Interpretation, History, Geschichte

Article Details

Author Biography

Silvana Filippi, Universidad Nacional de Rosario - Conicet

PhD in Philosophy from the National University of Cordoba, Argentina. Post-doctorate from the National University of Rosario, Argentina. She is a senior researcher at the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (Conicet) and professor at the Universidad Nacional de Rosario.

References

Carpio, Adolfo. Principios de Filosofía: Una introducción a su problemática. Buenos Aires: Glauco, 2004.

Castello Dubra, Julio Antonio. “La actualidad de la filosofía medieval: Un reciente debate historiográfico”. En Presente y futuro de la filosofía, editado por Alejandro Cassini y Laura Skerk, 145-244. Buenos Aires: Universidad de Buenos Aires, 2010.

Diels, Hermann. Doxographi Graeci. Berlín: Reimer, 1879.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. “Heidegger und die Griechen”. En Zur philosophischen Aktualität Heideggers, Band 1. Herausgegeben von Dietriech Papenfuß und Otto Pöggeler. Fráncfort del Meno: Klostermann, 1991.

Gilson, Étienne. El ser y los filósofos. Pamplona: Eunsa, 1979.

Heidegger, Martin. Nietzsche I, GA Band 6.1. Fráncfort del Meno: Klostermann, 1996.

Kerbs, Raúl. “El método histórico-crítico en teología: En busca de su estructura básica y de las interpretaciones filosóficas subyacentes (Parte I)”. DavarLogos 1, n.º 2 (2002): 105-123.

Kerbs, Raúl. “El método histórico-crítico en teología: En busca de su estructura básica y de las interpretaciones filosóficas subyacentes (Parte II)”. DavarLogos 2, n.º 1 (2003): 1-27.

Leocata, Francisco. “Relación entre historia de la filosofía y filosofía teorética”. Sapientia 70, n.º 236 (2014): 47-78.

Lértora Mendoza, Celina. “Filosofía medieval e historia de la filosofía medieval: Notas epistémico-metodológicas I. Filosofía medieval y programa de investigación”. En Filosofía en el Edad Media: Dossier de investigación actual en Latinoamérica, coordinado por Celina Lértora Mendoza e Ignacio Pérez Costanzó, 142-154. Buenos Aires: Red Latinoamericana de Filosofía Medieval, 2020.

Pardo Fariña, Felipe. “El método histórico-crítico en Jesús de Nazaret de Joseph Ratzinger”. Veritas: Revista de Filosofía y Teología 3, n.º 18 (2008): 129-146.

Raveton, Chirine. “Pourquoi et comment étudier la philosophie médiévale?”. Klēsis: Revue philosophique 11 (2009): 42-52.