Humanism on the challenge of the dialogue between faith and reason in the post secular society
Article Sidebar
Downloads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Secularization, as a product of Modernity, seeks for the independence of reason from any influence of religious or moral nature. In a society that feels doubtful about the diverse religious experience, the believer citizens should not give up their identity, but at the same time should learn how to establish a dialogue with those who, in terms of Habermas, might be called secular citizens. The following research aims to create connections that enable a dialogue between Faith and Reason in a Post Secular Society. From a systematic and interpretative study of the vision we have on Humanism, especially in the modern period, it is intended to find common ground between the ways of thinking, both secular and religious, which allows seeing that fine thread that leads both positions towards some shared concerns: man, his cause and his fate.
References
Aristóteles. Metafísica 6, 1071b2-1072a18.
Benedicto XVI. (2006a). Discurso de Regensburg del 12 de septiembre de 2006. Zenit. Recuperado el 22 de noviembre de 2012 de http://www.zenit.org/es/articles/ discurso-de-benedicto-xvi-en-la-universidad-de-ratisbona
Benedicto XVI. (2006b). Discurso durante el encuentro con los jóvenes, del 6 de abril de 2006. Vatican.va. Recuperado de http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/ Benedict_xvi/speeches/2006/april/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20060406_ xxi-wyd_sp.html
Benedicto XVI. (2005). Deus Caritas Est. Roma: Editrice Vaticana.
Gabriel, K. (2005). Trasfondo social del proceso de diferenciación en la sociedad y en los mundos vitales de los seres humanos. Concilium, 174-182.
Galileo. (1613). Carta a Benedetto Castelli del año 1613. Recuperado de http://www. mundolibertario.org/secciontumornegro/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/ carta-de-Galileo.pdf
Galileo. (1615). Carta a M. Cristina di Lorena del año 1615. Recuperado de http:// cita.es/filosofar/Galileo/
Habermas, J. (2002). El futuro de la naturaleza humana. ¿Hacia una eugenesia liberal? España: Paidós.
________. (2008). El resurgimiento de la religión, ¿un reto para la autocomprensión de la modernidad? Dianoia, 3-20.
Pera, M. y Ratzinger, J. (2005). L’Europa di Benedetto nella crisi delle culture, Cantagalli. Roma: Editrice Vaticana.
Ratzinger, J. y Habermas, J. (2004). Etica, religione e Stato liberale. Roma: Morcelliana.
Ratzinger, J. (1995). Verdad, valores y poder. Piedras de toque de la sociedad pluralista. Madrid: Rialp.
________. (2005a). Fede verità e tolleranza, il cristianesimo e le religioni del mondo. Roma: Cantagalli.
________. (2005b). Discurso en Subiaco, el 1 de abril de 2005. Zenit. Recuperado de http://www.zenit.org/es/articles/la-ultima-conferencia-de-ratzingereuropa-en-la-crisis-de-las-culturas
________. (2005c). L’Europa di Benedetto nella crisi delle culture. Roma: Cantagalli.
________. (2005d). Fede, Veritá, Tolleranza. Il cristianesimo e le religioni del mondo. Roma: Cantagalli.
________. (2005e). Introducción al Cristianismo. Salamanca: Sígueme.
________. (2006). Verdad, valores y poder. Madrid: Rialp.
Ruini, C. (2007). La ragione, le scienze ed il futuro della civiltà, Chiesa. Recuperado de http://chiesa.espresso.repubblica.it/articolo/124401
Schianchi, P. (2007). Nuovamente anonimi. Il Sole 24 Ore Business Media. 32.