Language and action: beliefs, institutions and politics
Article Sidebar
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Downloads
Societal impact
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article seeks to consolidate the conceptual bases as analytical tools of a social research based on strong conceptions of language and action. This is carried out from the clarification of what can be understood as language and how this necessarily results in human action. Three fundamental components are developed for social research in this regard: beliefs, discourse, and behavior. Each of them is developed in a particular way, with examples of how they can be performed. The binding element of the whole proposal is the practical notion of reason, which not only specifies the conception of language presupposed, but also clarifies the scope of the research questions that are worth investigating in the field of social sciences.
Article Details
References
Acero, J. J. (2007). Filosofía del lenguaje I. Semántica. Trotta.
Barnett, W. (2007). Making Social Worlds. A Communication Perspective. Blackwell.
Binmore, K. (2005). Natural Justice. Oxford University Press.
Binmore, K. (2009). Rational Decisions. Oxford University Press.
Brandom, R. (2005). Hacerlo explícito: razonamiento, representación y compromiso dis- cursivo. Herder.
Brandom, R. (2008). Between Saying and Doing: Towards an Analytic Pragmatism.
Oxford University Press.
Davidson, D. (2001). Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford University Press
Deutsch, M., Coleman, P. y Marcus, E. (2005). The Handbook of Conflict Resolution. Theory and Practice. Josey-Bass.
Elster, J. (2015). Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences.
Cambridge University Press.
Fann, K. T. (2015). Wittgenstein’s Conception of Philosophy. Patridge.
Korta, K. y Perry, J. (2020). Pragmatics. En E. N. Salta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/pragmatics/
Locke, J. (1999). Ensayo sobre el entendimiento humano. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
McDowell, J. (1998). Mind, Value and Reality. Harvard University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (2012). Cómo esclarecer nuestras ideas. En N. Houser y C. Kloesel (eds.), Obra filosófica reunida. Tomo I: 1867-1893, (pp. 172-188). Fondo de Cultura Eco- nómica.
Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism. A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford University Press.
Rawls, J. (1955). Two Concepts of Rules. The Philosophical Review, 64(1), 3-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/2218309
Rawls, J. (1996). Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press.
Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition. The Belknap Press.
Rodríguez Ortiz, A. y Ramírez - Vallejo, D. A. (2021). Wittgenstein y Searle: entre los juegos de lenguaje y los actos de habla. En F. Santamaría Velasco, N. Rosanía Maza y K. Cárdenas Almanza (eds.), Perspectivas wittgensteinianas: lenguaje, significado y acción (pp. 403-446). Tirant lo Blanch.
Ruiz-Martínez, S. y Rosanía Maza, N. A. (2021). Tres coordenadas lógicas para la ob- jetividad. En F. Santamaría Velasco, N. A. Rosanía Maza y K. Cárdenas Almanza, Perspectivas Wittgensteinianas: lenguaje, significado y acción (pp. 101-140). Tirant lo Blanc.
Santamaría Velasco, F. (2016). Hacer mundos: el nombrar y la significatividad. Siglo del Hombre.
Santamaría Velasco, F. y Ruiz-Martínez, S. (2019). ¿Qué significa pertenecer a una co- munidad? Disputatio Philosophical Research Bulletin, 8(9), 1-27.
Sartori, G. (2002). La política: lógica y método en ciencias sociales. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. The Free Press.
Searle, J. R. (2010). Making the Social World. The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford University Press.
Sellars, W. (1997). Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Harvard University Press.
Sellars, W. (2005). Pure Pragmatics and Possible Worlds. Ridgeview.
Shick, F. (2000). Hacer elecciones. Gedisa.
Shick, F. (2003). Ambiguity and Logic. Cambridge University Press.
Sosa, E. (2011). Knowing Full Well. Princeton University Press.
Spohn, W. (1982). How to Make Sense of Game Theory. En W. Stegmüller, W. Balzer y W. (eds.), Philosophy of Economics. Studies in Contemporary Economics (vol. 2, pp. 239-270). Springer.
Spohn, W. (2012). The Laws of Belief. Ranking Theory & Its Philosophical Applications. Oxford University Press.
Thompson, J. B. (1987). Language and Ideology: A Framework for Analysis. The Socio- logical Review, 35(3), 516-536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1987.tb00554.x
Tomasini Bassols, A. (2016). Reasons and causes: Wittgenstein versus Davidson. Praxis Filosófica, 43, 13-36.
Toulmin, S. (2007). Los usos de la argumentación. Península.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006
Waismann, F. (1968). How I See Philosophy. Macmillan.
Weber, M. (2012). “Objectivity” and Knowledge in Social Science and Social Policy. Rout- ledge.
Williams, B. (2008). In the Beginning was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. Princeton University Press.
Winch, P. (1990). The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy. Routledge.
Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On Certainty. Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical Investigations (3.ª ed., P. M. S. Hacker y J. Schulte, eds.). Wiley-Blackwell.