Neuropsychological characterization in children between 6 and 8 years with very low birth weight and preterm birth

Main Article Content

Martha Luz Russi Navarrete
David Andrés Montoya Arenas

Abstract

Objective: Medical and neonatal ICU efforts have made it possible to preserve the life of patients born prematurely. The main serious disorders associated with very low birth weight are cerebral palsy, deafness, blindness, developmental delay, mental retardation, and epilepsy. Of these children, 50% show intellectual disability, a high incidence of communication or learning disabilities, academic failure, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, specific neuropsychological deficits, and behavioral issues. This study analyzed the neuropsychological characteristics of 45 children between the ages of six and eight who were premature and had very low weight at birth.


Methods: Observational, cross-sectional study in children born between 2005 and 2006. Upon parents’ informed consent, tests were applied to measure IQ and superior intellectual ability (WISC-IV and ENI).


Results: Adequate performance is observed regarding intellectual capacity, where better performance was observed in those with greater gestational age with statistically significant differences in perceptive reasoning. In extremely premature babies, there was below average performance in metalinguistic abilities, long-term visual memory, verbal fluency, and cognitive flexibility. This reduced performance, along with lower IQ scores, was more notorious in children with a history of sepsis and intraventricular hemorrhage.


Conclusions: Preterm birth and very low birth weight has a negative effect on neuropsychological functions. Below average neuropsychological performance (metalinguistic abilities, visual memory, verbal fluency, and cognitive flexibility) could explain neuropsychiatric problems present during growth.

Keywords:
infant, premature, birth weight, intellectual disability, neuropsychological tests

Article Details

Author Biographies

Martha Luz Russi Navarrete, St. Bonaventure University

Doctor. Master in Neuropsychology, University of San Buenaventura, Medellín campus. SURA doctor. Medellin Colombia.

David Andrés Montoya Arenas, St. Bonaventure University

Psychologist. Master in Neuropsychology. PhD in Psychology with Orientation in Applied Cognitive Neurosciences, Maimonides University, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Teacher-researcher, Director of the Social Neuroscience Line, Psychology and Neuroscience Group, Director of the Gruneco neurodevelopment line, Director of the Master's Degree in Neuropsychology, University of San Buenaventura, Medellín campus. Medellin Colombia

References

Bennett FC, Scott DT. Long-term perspective on premature infant outcome and contemporary intervention issues. Semin Perinatol 1997; 21(3):190–201.

Buck GM, Msall ME, Schisterman EF, Lyon NR, Rogers BT. Extreme prematurity and school outcomes. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2000; 14(4):324–331.

Taylor HG, Klein N, Minich NM, Hack M. Middle-school-age outcomes in children with very low birthweight. Child Dev 2000; 71(6):1495–1511.

Pignotti MS, Donzelli G. Perinatal care at the threshold of viability: An international comparison of practical guidelines for the treatment of extremely preterm births. Pediatrics 2008; 121(1):193–198.

Eichenwald EC, Stark AR, Vohr BR, Jobe AH, Wright LL, Fanaroff AA, et al. Management and outcomes of very low birth weight. N Engl J Med 2008; 358(16):1700–1711.

Narberhaus A, Pueyo-Benito R, Segarra-Castells MD, Perapoch-López J, Botet-Mussons F, Junqué C. Disfunciones cognitivas a largo plazo relacionadas con la prematuridad. Rev Neurol 2007; 45:224–228.

Wood NS, Costeloe K, Gibson AT, Hennessy EM, Marlow N, Wilkinson AR. The EPICure study: associations and antecedents of neurological and developmental disability at 30 months of age following extremely preterm birth. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2005; 90:134–140.

Charpak N, Calume Z, Hamel A. El método canguro: padres y familiares de niños prematuros pueden remplazar las incubadoras. Bogotá: McGraw-Hill; 1997.

Picard D, Del Dotto J, Breslau. Prematurity and low birth weight. K. Yeates, M., Taylor (Eds.), 2000; Pediatric Neuropsychology: 237-251.

Olsén P, Vainionpää L, Pääkkö E, Korkman M, Pyhtinen J, Järvelin MR. Psychological findings in preterm children related to neurologic status and magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatrics 1998; 102:329–336.

Peterson BS, Vohr B, Staib LH, Cannistraci CJ, Dolberg A, Schneider KC, et al. Regional brain volume abnormalities and long-term cognitive outcome in preterm infants. JAMA 2000; 284:1939–1947.

Briscoe J, Gathercole SE, Marlow N. Everyday memory and cognitive ability in children born very prematurely. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2001; 42:749–754.

Hille ET, Den Ouden AL, Bauer L, Van den Oudenrijn C, Brand R, Verloove-Vanhorick SP. School performance at nine years of age in very premature and very low birth weight infants: Perinatal risk factors and predictors at five years of age. Collaborative Project on Preterm and Small for Gestational Age (POPS) Infants in The Netherlands. The Journal of Pediatrics 1994; 125:426–434.

Neubauer AP, Voss W, Kattner E. Outcome of extremely low birth weight survivors at school age: the influence of perinatal parameters on neurodevelopment. Eur J Pediatr 2008; 167:87–95.

Álvarez P. Morbilidad y secuelas de los niños prematuros en edad escolar [Tesis doctoral]. Valladolid: Departamento de Pediatría, Universidad de Valladolid; 2009.

Marlow N, Wolke D, Bracewell MA, Samara M. Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J M 2005; 352:9–19.

Dewey DG, Crawford SG, Creighton DE, Sauve RS. Long-term neuropsychological outcomes in very low birth weight children free of sensorineural impairments. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1999; 21:851–865.

Goyen TA, Lui K, Woods R. Visual-motor, visual-perceptual, and fine motor outcomes in verylow-birthweight children at 5 years. Dev Med Child Neurol 1998; 40:76–81.

Le Normand MT, Cohen H. The delayed emergence of lexical morphology in preterm children: The case of verbs. J Neurolinguistics 1999; 12:235–246.

Singer LT, Siegel AC, Lewis B, Hawkins S, Yamashita T, Baley J. Preschool language outcomes of children with history of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and very low birth weight. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2001; 22:19–26.

Sebastiani M, Ceriani JM. Aspectos bioéticos en el cuidado de los recién nacidos extremadamente prematuros. Archivos Argentinos de Pediatría. 2008; 106:242–248.

Flanagan D, Kaufman A. Para la evaluación con WISC-IV. México: Manual Moderno; 2007.

Matute E, Rosselli M, Ardila A, Ostrosky-Solís F. ENI: Evaluación neuropsicológica infantil. México: Manual Moderno; 2007.

Whitaker AH, Feldman JF, Van Rossem R, Schonfeld IS, Pinto-Martin JA, Torre C, et al. Neonatal cranial ultrasound abnormalities in low birth weight infants: relation to cognitive outcomes at six years of age. Pediatrics. 1996; 98(4 Pt 1):719–729.

Portellano JA. Neuropsicología infantil. Madrid: Síntesis; 2007.

Hack M, Fanaroff AA. Outcomes of children of extremely low birthweight and gestational age in the 1990s. Semin Neonatol 2000; 5:89–106.

Parikh NA, Lasky RE, Kennedy KA, McDavid G, Tyson JE. Perinatal factors and regional brain volume abnormalities at term in a cohort of extremely low birth weight infants. PloS One. 2013; 8(5):e62804

Peterson BS. Brain imaging studies of the anatomical and functional consequences of preterm birth for human brain development. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2003; 1008:219–237.

Peterson BS, Vohr B, Kane MJ, Whalen DH, Schneider KC, Katz KH, et al. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of language processing and its cognitive correlates in prematurely born children. Pediatrics 2002; 110(6):1153–1162.

Castro P, Barraza P. Diferencias cerebrales en prematuros y su relación con el desarrollo de sus funciones cognitivas. Terapia Psicológica 2007; 25:183–188.

Most read articles by the same author(s)