Sistemas de activación y de inhibición de conducta y su relación con el funcionamiento ejecutivo en excombatientes irregulares del conflicto armado colombiano
Barra lateral del artículo
Descargas
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Objetivo: Explorar la relación entre los sistemas de activación de conducta (SAC) / sistema de inhibición de conducta (SIC) y funciones ejecutivas (FE) en excombatientes del conflicto armado colombiano.
Metodología: Estudio observacional, exploratorio, con muestra no aleatoria de 39 excombatientes del programa de la Alta Consejería de la Presidencia para la Reintegración, residentes en Antioquia-Colombia, edad 35±7.6 años, 87.2% hombres, y escolaridad 10±2.8 grados; comparados con un grupo control de 14 no combatientes (edad 33±6.1 años, 71.4% hombres y escolaridad 10±2.7 grados). Se les administró un cuestionario de SAC/SIC, usando la sensibilidad a la recompensa (SR) y la sensibilidad al castigo (SC). Para la FE se aplicó la prueba Ineco Frontal Screening (IFS).
Resultados: Hubo alteraciones específicas de la FE: en la ejecución de instrucciones conflictivas (IC), memoria de trabajo verbal (MTV) y control inhibitorio verbal (CIV). Se evidenciaron correlaciones directas, con coeficientes de moderados a altos entre el SAC (SR) y la capacidad de abstracción CA, el control motor inhibitorio (CMI), la MTV, la memoria de trabajo espacial (MTE) y el funcionamiento ejecutivo global (IFSTOT).
Conclusiones: Los excombatientes presentaron un rendimiento inferior en la memoria de trabajo verbal y el control inhibitorio verbal, lo que impacta las capacidades de anticipación, establecimiento de metas, diseño de planes, iniciación de conductas voluntarias y el control inhibitorio. Lo anterior puede generar la toma de decisiones equivocadas.
Citas
Gray JA. Three fundamental emotion systems. Nat Emot Fundam Quest. 1994; 14:243-247.
Gray JA, McNaughton N. The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septohippocampal system. Oxford Univarsity Press, editor. New York; 2000.
Ganesh S, Kandasamy A, Sahayaraj US, Benegal V. Adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in patients with substance use disorders: A study from Southern India. Indian J Psychol Med. 2017; 39(1):59-62.
Ganesh S, Kandasamy A, Sahayaraj US, Benegal V. Behavioral activation and behavioral inhibition sensitivities in patients with substance use disorders: A study from India. Indian J Psychiatry. 2018; 60(3):346-50.
Gudiño OG, Nadeem E, Kataoka SH, Lau AS. Relative impact of violence exposure and immigrant stressors on Latino youth psychopathology. J Community Psychol. 2011; 39(3):316-35.
Gudiño OG, Nadeem E, Kataoka SH, Lau AS. Reinforcement sensitivity and risk for psychopathology following exposure to violence: A vulnerability-specificity model in Latino youth. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2012; 43(2):306–21.
Watson D, Wiese D, Vaidya J, Tellegen A. The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999; 76(5):820-38.
Arfaie A, Safikhanlou S, Roodsari AB, Farnam A, Shafiee-Kandjani AR. Assessment of behavioral approach and behavioral inhibition systems in mood disorders. Basic Clin Neurosci. 2018; 9(4):261-68.
De Pascalis V, Sommer K, Scacchia P. Resting frontal asymmetry and reward sensitivity theory motivational traits. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):1-9.
Jones E, Gable PA. On the role of asymmetric frontal cortical activity in approach and withdrawal motivation: An updated review of the evidence on the role of asymmetric frontal cortical activity in approach and withdrawal motivation: An updated review of the evidence. Psychophysiology. 2018; 55(1):e12879.
Krmpotich TD, Tregellas JR, Thompson LL, Banich MT, Klenk AM, Tanabe JL. Resting-state activity in the left executive control network is associated with behavioral approach and is increased in substance dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013; 129(1–2):1-7.
Johnson PL, Potts GF, Sánchez-Ramos J, Cimino CR. Self-reported impulsivity in Huntington’s disease patients and relationship to executive dysfunction and reward responsiveness. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2017;39(7): 694-706.
Giancola PR. Evidence for dorsolateral and orbital prefrontal cortical involvement in the expression of aggressive behavior. Aggress Behav. 1995; 21(6):431-50.
Filley CM, Price BH, Nell V, Antoinette T, Morgan AS, Bresnahan JF, et al. Toward an understanding of violence: Neurobehavioral aspects of unwarranted physical aggression: Aspen Neurobehavioral Conference consensus statement. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2001; 14(1):1-14.
Giancola PR. Executive functioning: A conceptual framework for alcohol-related aggression. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2000; 8(4):576-97.
Verdejo-García A, Pérez-García M, Sánchez-Barrera M, Rodríguez-Fernández A, Gómez-Río M. Neuroimagen y drogodependencias: correlatos neuroanatómicos del consumo de cocaína, opiáceos, cannabis y éxtasis. Rev Neurol. 2007; 44(7):432-9.
Verdejo-García A, López-Torrecillas F, Giménez CO, Pérez-García M. Clinical implications and methodological challenges in the study of the neuropsychological correlates of cannabis, stimulant, and opioid abuse. Neuropsychol Rev. 2004; 14(1):1-41.
OPS. Informe mundial sobre la violencia y la salud. Organización Panamericana de la Salud; 2002.
Grande-García I. Neurociencia social: El maridaje entre la psicología social y las neurociencias cognitivas. Revisión e introducción a un nueva disciplina. An Psicol Psychol. 2009; 25(1):1-20.
Goldberg E. El cerebro ejecutivo: lóbulos frontales y mente civilizada. Planeta, Barcelona; 2015.
Tirapu-Ustárroz J, García-Molina A, Luna-Lario P, Roig-Rovira T, Pelegrín-Valero C. Modelos de funciones y control ejecutivo (II). Rev Neurol. 2008; 46(12):742-50.
Trujillo N, Pineda DA. Función ejecutiva en la investigación de los trastornos del comportamiento del niño y del adolescente. Rev Neuropsicol Neuropsiq Neurocien. 2008; 8(1):77-94.
Torralva T, Roca M, Gleichgerrecht E, López P, Manes F. INECO Frontal Screening (IFS): A brief, sensitive, and specific tool to assess executive functions in dementia. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009; 15(5):777-86.
Pinto MA. Sistemas de activación e inhibición conductual en los trastornos depresivos atendidos en la atención primaria en salud. Un estudio de seguimiento a 6 meses. Barcelona. UA de, editor. Victoria; 2004.
Torrubia R, Avila C, Moltó J, Caseras X. The sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward questionnaire (SPSRQ) as a measure of Gray’s anxiety and impulsivity dimensions. Pers Individ Dif. 2001; 31(6):837-62.
Fritz CO, Morris PE, Richler JJ. Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. J Exp Psychol Genera. 2012; 141(1):2-18.
Blanchette I, Rutembesa E, Habimana E, Caparos S. Long-term cognitive correlates of exposure to trauma: Evidence from Rwanda. Psychol Trauma Theory. 2019; 11(2):147-55.
Kois LE, Blakey SM, Gardner BO, McNally MR, Johnson JL, Hamer RM, et al. Neuropsychological correlates of self-reported impulsivity and informant-reported maladaptive behaviour among veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury history. Brain Inj. 2018; 32(12):1484-91.
Wallinius M, Nordholm J, Wagnström F, Billstedt E. Cognitive functioning and aggressive antisocial behaviors in young violent offenders. Psychiatry Res. 2019; 272:572-80.
Fogleman ND, Naaz F, Knight LK, Stoica T, Patton SC, Olson-Madden JH, et al. Reduced lateral prefrontal cortical volume is associated with performance on the modified Iowa Gambling Task: A surface based morphometric analysis of previously deployed veterans. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2017; 267:1-8.
Janulewicz PA, Krengel MH, Maule A, White RF, Cirillo J, Sisson E, et al. Neuropsychological characteristics of Gulf War illness: A meta-analysis. Plos One. 2017; 12(5):e0177121.
Liverant GI, Amick MM, Black SK, Esterman M, Wisco BE, Gibian MC, et al. Associations among posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, substance use, and affective attentional processing in OEF/OIF/OND Veterans. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2017; 205(9):725-31.
DeGutis J, Esterman M, McCulloch B, Rosenblatt A, Milberg W, McGlinchey R. Posttraumatic psychological symptoms are associated with reduced inhibitory control, not general executive dysfunction. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2015; 21(5):342-52.
Van Rooij SJ, Rademaker AR, Kennis M, Vink M, Kahn RS, Geuze E. Impaired right inferior frontal gyrus response to contextual cues in male veterans with PTSD during response inhibition. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2014; 39(5):330-8.
Koso M, Hansen S. Executive function and memory in posttraumatic stress disorder: A study of Bosnian war veterans. Eur Psychiatry. 2006; 21(3):167-73.
Stricker NH, Lippa SM, Green DL, McGlynn SM, Grande LJ, Milberg WP, et al. Elevated rates of memory impairment in military service-members and veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2017; 39(8):768-85.
Krueger RF, South SC. Externalizing disorders: Cluster 5 of the proposed meta-structure for DSM-V and ICD-11: Paper 6 of 7 of the thematic section: A proposal for a meta-structure for DSM-V and ICD-11. Psychol Med. 2009; 39(12):2061-70.
Johnson SL, Turner RJ, Iwata N. BIS/BAS levels and psychiatric disorder: An epidemiological study. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2003; 25(1):25-36.
Gable PA, Harmon-Jones E. Trait behavioral approach sensitivity (BAS) relates to early (<150 ms) electrocortical responses to appetitive stimuli. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013; 8(7):795-8.
Kollmann B, Scholz V, Linke J, Kirsch P, Wessa M. Reward anticipation revisited-evidence from an fMRI study in euthymic bipolar I patients and healthy first-degree relatives. J Affect Disord. 2017; 219:178-86.
Sommer K, van der Molen MW, De Pascalis V. BIS/BAS sensitivity and emotional modulation in a prepulse-inhibition paradigm: A brain potential study. Physiol Behav. 2016; 154:100-13.
Li Y, Qiao L, Sun J, Wei D, Li W, Qiu J, et al. Gender-specific neuroanatomical basis of behavioral inhibition/approach systems (BIS/BAS) in a large sample of young adults: A voxel-based morphometric investigation. Behav Brain Res. 2014; 274:400-8.
Newman JP, MacCoon DG, Vaughn LJ, Sadeh N. Validating a distinction between primary and secondary psychopathy with measures of Gray’s BIS and BAS constructs. J Abnorm Psychol. 2005; 114(2):319-23.
Quay HC. The psychobiology of undersocialized aggressive conduct disorder: A theoretical perspective. Dev Psychopathol. 1993; 5(1-2):165-80.
Rolls ET. On the brain and emotion. Behav Brain Sci. 2000; 23(2):219-28.
Raine A. Antisocial behavior and psychophysiology: A biosocial perspective and a prefrontal dysfunction hypothesis. Handbook of antisocial behavior. John Wiley & Sons. New York; 1997. 289-304 p.
Morgan AB, Lilienfeld SO. A meta-analytic review of the relation between antisocial behavior and neuropsychological measures of executive function. Clin Psychol Rev. 2000; 20(1):113-36.