Plotinus’ Foundations of the Soul and Its Reception in Augustine of Hippo En. IV, 8 [7] in Gn. adu. Man. 2, 12
Main Article Content
Abstract
In our work, we present the following hypothesis: the passage of Plotinus En. IV, 8 [7] is present in Augustine of Hippo's gn. adu. man. 2, 12; as it is not a direct quotation and as there is also an ongoing controversy about the content of the Libri platonicorum, that collection of texts translated into Latin which gave him access to an approach on the credibility of faith (conf. 7, 13), we approach this proposal from a triple movement of convergence: We present, first, the state of the question about the authors who would form part of that collection of Platonic texts; then, the clarifications regarding the soul in Plotinus and the difficulties he encountered in his path of understanding and, finally, the way in which this conception had an impact on the creatural notion of Augustine of Hippo, at the time of the aforementioned exegesis. In this context, we find the turn medietas animae, to explain the situation of the soul in paradise, which allows us to postulate the use of a Latin text, in which the Plotinian expression μέση τάξις is translated. We conclude, following this perspective of analysis, that Augustine of Hippo explains, by means of En. IV, 8 [7], the fall of the soul, in a way that is in accordance with Scripture. Our method of work is philological, as a science of understanding, through a careful reading of the Plotinian and Augustinian texts.
References
Alfaric, P. (1918). L’Evolution intellectuelle de saint Augustin. Vol. I. Du Manichéisme au Néoplatonisme. Paris: Émile Noury.
Andolfo, M, (1996). L'ipostasi della “Psyche” in Plotino. Struttura e Fondamenti. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
Beatrice, P. F. (1989). Quosdam Platonicorun Libros: The Platonic Reading of Augustine in Milan. Vigiliae Christianae, 43(3), 248-281. https://doi.org/10.2307/1584064
Berti, E. (2012). La genesi della dottrina aristotelica dei principi. En U. Bruchmüller (Hrsg.). Platons Hermeneutik und Prinzipiendenken im Licht der Dialoge und des antiken Tradition. Festschrift für Thomas Alexander Szlezák zum 70 (pp. 203-222). Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag.
Bouillet, M.-N. (2018[1859]). Les Ennéades de Plotin, chef de I ‘École néoplatonicienne (Vol. I). Paris: Forgotten Books.
Boyer, Ch. (1920). Christianisme et néo-platonisme dans la formation de saint Augustin. Paris: Beauchesne.
Burchill-Limb, K. Y. (2003). “De pulchro et apto” de san Agustín: ¿obra perdida y nada más? Augustinus, 48(188/191), 27-33. https://doi.org/10.5840/augustinus200348188/1914
Calabrese, C. (2020). Una comprensión de la realidad en clave neoplatónica. Dos pasajes del De ordine de San Agustín. Revista de Humanidades, (41), 105-128. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3212/321262129004/
Catapano, G. (2000). L’idea di filosofia in Agostino. Padua: Il Poligrafo.
Courcelle, P. (1948). Les lettres grecques en Occident de Macrobe à Cassiodore. Paris: Editions de Boccard. Courcelle, P. (1950). Recherches sur les “Confessions” de Saint Augustin. Paris: Editions de Boccard.
Courcelle, P. (1954). Litiges sur la lecture des “Libri Platonicorum” par Saint Augustin. Augustiniana, 4(3/4), 225-239. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44991757
Chiaradonna, R. (2023). Ontology in Early Neoplatonism. Plotinus, Porphyry, Iamblichus. Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
D’Ancona, C. (2003). Plotino. La discesa dell`anima nei corpi (Enn. IV 8 [6]). Plotiniana Arabica (Pseudo-Teologia di Aristotele, Capitoli 1 E 7; “Detti del sapienti greco”). Padova: Il Poligrafo.
Dionísio, J. (2022). El concepto de cuerpo a través del alma en Plotino: una valoración positiva. Praxis Filosófica, (55), 189-206. https://doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i55.12076
Dörrie, H. (1959). Porphyrios‘ Symmikta Zetemata. Ihre Stellung in System und Geschichte des Neuplatonismus nebst einem Kommentar zu den Fragmenten (Coll. “Zetemata”). München: C. H. Beck.
Du Roy, O. (1966). L'intelligence de la foi en la Trinité selon saint Augustin. Genèse de sa théologie trinitaire jusqu'en 391. Paris: Études Augustiniennes.
Festugière, A. J. (1990). La Révélation d’Hermes Trismégiste. III Les doctrines de l´âme, suivi de Jamblique, Traité de l´âme, traduction et commentaire; Porphyre, De l`animation de l`embryon. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Gerson, L. P. (1997). Epistrophê pros heauton: History and Meaning. Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, (8), 1-32.
Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. (1982). L’Édition porphyrienne des Ennéades: État de la question. En L. Brisson, M. O. Goulet-Cazé, R. Goulet y D. O’Brien. Porphyre: La Vie de Plotin. I. Travaux préliminaires et index grec complet (pp. 280-327). Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.
Grandgeorge, L. (1966[1896]). Saint Augustin et le Néoplatonisme. Frankfurt: Minerva.
Grisei, P. (2000). Visione e conoscenza. Il “gioco” analogico di “Repubblica” VI-VII. En G. Casertano (a cura di). La struttura del dialogo platonico (pp. 262-296). Napoli: Loffredo Editore.
Guitton, J. (2004). Le Temps et l’éternité chez Plotin et saint Augustin. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.
Hadot, P. (1960). Citations de Porphyre chez Augustin (a propos d'un ouvrage récent). Revue d’Études Augustiniennes Et Patristiques, 6(3), 205-244. https://doi.org/10.1484/J.REA.5.104002
Halfwassen, J. (2012). Plotins Interpretation der Prinzipientheorie Platons. En U. Bruchmüller (Hrsg.). Platons Hermeneutik und Prinzipiendenken im Licht der Dialoge und des antiken Tradition. Festschrift für Thomas Alexander Szlezák zum 70 (pp. 223-244). Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag.
Henry, P. (1934). Plotin et l’Occident. Firmicus Maternus, Marius Victorinus, saint Augustin et Macrobe. Louvain: Spicilegium Sacrum Lovaniense.
Koch, A. F. (2012). Prädikate von und Relationen zwischen Ideen in Platons Parmenides und Sophistes. En U. Bruchmüller (Hrsg.). Platons Hermeneutik und Prinzipiendenken im Licht der Dialoge und des antiken Tradition. Festschrift für Thomas Alexander Szlezák zum 70 (pp. 223-244). Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag.
Köning, E. (1970). Augustinus Philosophus. Christlicher Glaube und philosophisches Denken in der Frühschriften Augustins. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
Matthews, A. W. (1980). The Development of St. Augustine from Neoplatonism to Christianity 386-391 A. D. Washington: University Press of America.
Ninci, M. y Taormina, D. P. (2015). Plotino, sobre el viviente universal y el viviente individual. Un esbozo preliminar al estudio sobre el tema de la sensación y de las pasiones. Cuadernos de Filosofía, 64, 23-33.
Nörregaard, J. (1923). Augustins Bekehrung. Tübingen: Mohr.
O’Daly, G. J.P (1987), Augustine´s Philosophy of Mind. Berkeley-Los Angeles : University of California Press.
O’Connell, R. J. (1968). St. Augustine’s Early Theory of Man, A.D. 386-391. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
O’Meara, J. J. (1954). The Young Augustine: The Growth of St. Augustine's Mind Up to His Conversion. London: Longmans, Green and Co.
Ramón Cámara, B. (2023). Sobre la “asombrosa trascendencia” de la Idea de Bien en la República de Platón. Daimon. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, (88), 37-51.
Rombs, R. J. (2006). Saint Augustine and the Fall of the Soul. Beyond O’Connell and His Critics. Washington: Catholic University of America Press.
Solignac, A. (1957). Réminiscences plotiniennes et porphyriennes dans le début du “De ordine” de saint Augustin. Archives de Philosophie, 20(3), 446-465.
Szlezak, Th. A. (1997). Platone e Aristotele nella dottrina del “Nous” di Plotino (A. Trotta, Trad.). Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
Testard, M. (1958). Saint Augustin et Cicéron, I: Cicéron dans la formation et dans l'œuvre de Saint Augustin. Paris: Études Augustiniennes.
Theiler, W. (1966). Forschungen zum Neuplatonismus. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co.
Trelenberg, J. (2004). Das Prinzip “Einheit” beim frühen Augustinus. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Vegetti, M. (1999). Guida alla lettura della Repubblica di Platone. Roma: Editori Laterza.
Voss, B. R. (1963). Spuren von Porphyrios “De regressu animae” bei Augustin “De vera religione”. Museum Helveticum, 20(4), 237-239.