Señalando el camino de la paz y la justicia: El Paterfamilias como constructor de la paz en De ciuitate Dei, Libro XIX
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Desde la antigüedad, la familia siempre ha desempeñado un papel importante en la vida y el bienestar de las comunidades y las sociedades. Este capítulo examina de manera crítica la centralidad de la familia y del paterfamilias en las reflexiones de Agustín sobre la paz, la justicia, el amor y la resolución de conflictos. Basándose principalmente en el Libro XIX de De ciuitate Dei y en otros escritos de Agustín, este ensayo se centra en el concepto de paterfamilias, una idea a menudo olvidada y poco reconocida en el pensamiento del obispo de Hipona tanto en los estudios pasados como en los actuales. Sostengo que el paterfamilias se sitúa en el epicentro de la construcción y la propagación de la paz y la justicia tanto en el ámbito familiar como en otras esferas de la vida humana. Para demostrar cómo sucede esto, en primer lugar, se delimita la idea de familia como locus de la paz y como concepto jurídico, teológico y sociológico en tres niveles básicos. En segundo lugar, al tiempo que se destacan algunas formas de propagar y alcanzar la paz, especialmente en nuestro mundo posmoderno, se destaca la centralidad del amor y la colaboración como bases para la construcción de la paz y la resolución de conflictos.
Detalles del artículo
Referencias
Adams, J. (1971). The Populus of Augustine and Jerome: A Study in the Patristic Sense of Community. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Arendt, H. (1996). Love and Saint Augustine. Scott, J., and Stark, J. (Eds.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226225647.001.0001
Arjava, A. (1998). Paternal Power in Late Antiquity. The Journal of Roman Studies, 88, 147- 165. https://doi.org/10.2307/300809
Babcock, W. (2013). The City of God. The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century I/7. Boniface Ramsey (Ed.). New York: New City Press.
Bennett, J. (2008). Water is Thicker Than Blood: An Augustinian Theology of Marriage and Singleness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195315431.001.0001
Boulding, M. (2000). Expositions of the Psalms. The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century. John Rotelle (Ed.). New York: New City Press.
Brechtken, J. (1975). Augustinus Doctor Caritatis: Sein Liebesbegriff im Widerspruch von Eigennutz und selbstloser Güte im Rahmen der antiken Glückseligkeits-Ethik. Meisenheim: Verlag Anton Hain.
Burt, D. (1999). Friendship and Society: An Introduction to Augustine’s Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Eerdmans.
Canning, R. (1993). The Unity of Love for God and Neighbor in Saint Augustine. Heverlee-Leuven: Augustinian Historical Institute.
Cary, P. (2005). “United Inwardly by Love: Augustine’s Social Ontology”. In Doody, J., Hughes, K., and Paffenroth, K. (Eds.). Augustine and Politics, pp. 3-33. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Combes, G. (1934). La Charité d’aprés Saint Augustine. Paris: Bibliothèque Augustinienne.
Deane, H. (1963). The Political and Social Ideas of St. Augustine. New York: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/dean93962
Dideberg, D. (1994). “Amor”. In C. Mayer (Ed.). Augustinus-Lexikon, pp. 294-299. Vol. 1. Basel: Schwabe.
Dupont, A. (2004). Using or Enjoying Humans: Uti and Frui in Augustine. Augustiniana, 54(1), 475-506.
Dupont, A. (2019). “Augustine of Hippo as Politician: Political Practices at the Service of Christian Ideals”. In Dupont, A., Bendímez, E., and Villabona, C. (Eds.). Agustín de Hipona como Doctor Pacis: estudios sobre la paz en el mundo contemporáneo, pp. 10-34. Vol. 2. Bogotá: Editorial Uniagustiniana.
Fuhrer, T. (2002). “Familia, familiaris, familiaritas”. In C. Mayer (Ed.). Augustinus-Lexikon, pp.1236-1240. Vol. 2. Basel: Schwabe.
Gardner, J. (1998). Family and Familia in Roman Law and Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gardner, J., and Wiedemann, T. (1991). The Roman Household: A Sourcebook. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203324059
Gregory, E. (2008). Politics and the Order of Love: An Augustinian Ethic of Democratic Citizenship. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Hill, E. (1996). Teaching Christianity. The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century I/11. J. Rotelle (Ed.). New York: New City Press.
Hill, E. (2009). Homilies on the Gospel of John 1-40. The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century I/12. A. Fitzgerald (Ed.). New York: New City Press.
Hughes, K. (2005). “Local Politics: The Political Place of the Household in Augustine’s City of God”. In Doody, J., Hughes, K., and Paffenroth, K. (Eds.). Augustine and Politics, pp. 145-164. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Lepelley, C. (2007). Facing Wealth and Poverty: Defining Augustine’s Social Doctrine. Augustinian Studies, 38(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.5840/augstudies1988199
Lorenz, R. (1951). Fruitio Dei bei Augustin. Zeitschrift Kirchengeschichte, 63, 75- 132.
Markus, R. (1965). Two Conceptions of Political Authority: Augustine, De Ciuitate Dei, XIX. 14-15, and Some Thirteenth-Century Interpretations. The Journal of Theological Studies, 16(1), 68-100. https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/XVI.1.68
Markus, R. (1970). Saeculum: History and Society in the Theology of St. Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nathan, G. (2000). The Family in Late Antiquity: The Rise of Christianity and the Endurance of Tradition. London: Routledge.
Nussbaum, M. (2000). Duties of Justice, Duties of Material Aid: Cicero’s Problematic Legacy. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 8(2), 176-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00098
O’Donovan, O. (1982). Usus and Fruitio in Augustine, De Doctrina Christiana I. Journal of Theological Studies, 33(2), 361-397. https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/XXXIII.2.361
Parkin, T. (2011). “The Roman Life Course and the Family”. In B. Rawson (Ed.). A Companion to Families in the Greek and Roman Worlds, pp. 276-290. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444390766.ch17
Ramsey, B. (2008). Homilies on the First Epistle of John. The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century I/14. Doyle, D., and Martin, T. (Eds.). New York: New City Press.
Ruokanen, M. (1993). Theology of Social Life in Augustine’s De ciuitate Dei. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht. https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666551611
Saller, R. (1984). Familia, Domus, and the Roman Conception of the Family. Phoenix, 38(4), 336-355. https://doi.org/10.2307/1088380
Saller, R. (1986). Patria Potestas and the Stereotype of the Roman Family. Continuity and Change, 1(1), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0268416000000059
Shaw, B. (1987). The Family in Late Antiquity: The Experience of Augustine. Past and Present, 115(1), 3-51.
Swift, L. (1979). Iustitia and Ius Privatum: Ambrose on Private Property. The American Journal of Philology, 100(1), 176-187. https://doi.org/10.2307/294237
Teske, R. (2003). Letters 100-155: The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century II/2. B. Ramsey (Ed.). New York: New City Press.
Van Bavel, T. (1993). Fruitio, delectation and voluptas in Augustine. Augustinus 37, 499-510. https://doi.org/10.5840/augustinus199338149/15131
Van Bavel, T. (1999). “Love”. In A. Fitzgerald (Ed.). Augustine through the Ages: An Encyclopedia, pp. 509-516. Michigan: Grand Rapids.
Van Egmond, B. (2019). ““To be One Heart and Soul in God”: Augustine on Peace within the Family”. In Dupont, A., Bendímez, E., and Villabona, C. (Eds.). Agustín de Hipona como Doctor Pacis: estudios sobre la paz en el mundo contemporáneo, pp. 93-114. Vol. 2. Bogotá: Editorial Uniagustiniana. https://doi.org/10.28970/9789585498235.3
Von Heyking, J. (2001). Augustine and Politics as Longing in the World. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
Von Kamptz, H. (2010). Pater. TLL, 10(1), 677- 679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0450.1963.tb00224.x
Williams, R. (1987). Politics and the Soul: A Reading of the City of God. Milltown Studies, 19(20), 55-72.
Wood, N. (1991). Cicero’s Social and Political Thought. California: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520911284
