Pointing the Way for Peace and Justice: The Paterfamilias as Peacebuilder in De ciuitate Dei, Book XIX
Article Sidebar
Downloads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Right from antique times, the family has always played a significant role in the life and wellbeing of communities and societies. This article critically examines the significance of the family and the concept of the paterfamilias in Augustine’s reflections on peace, justice, love, and conflict resolution. Drawing primarily from Book XIX of De ciuitate Dei and other writings of Augustine, this essay focuses on the concept of the paterfamilias, an oft-neglected and under-recognized idea in the thinking of the bishop of Hippo. This article will argue that the paterfamilias stands at the epicenter of building and propagating peace and justice both at the family level and other echelons of human life. To demonstrate how this happens, first, the idea of family as a locus for peace, and as a legal, theological and sociological concept is delimited at three basic levels. Second, while highlighting some ways through which peace can be propagated and attained, especially in our postmodern world, the centrality of love and collaboration as the bases for peacebuilding and conflict resolution will be emphasized.
References
Adams, J. (1971). The Populus of Augustine and Jerome: A Study in the Patristic Sense of Community. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Arendt, H. (1996). Love and Saint Augustine. Scott, J., and Stark, J. (Eds.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226225647.001.0001
Arjava, A. (1998). Paternal Power in Late Antiquity. The Journal of Roman Studies, 88, 147- 165. https://doi.org/10.2307/300809
Babcock, W. (2013). The City of God. The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century I/7. Boniface Ramsey (Ed.). New York: New City Press.
Bennett, J. (2008). Water is Thicker Than Blood: An Augustinian Theology of Marriage and Singleness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195315431.001.0001
Boulding, M. (2000). Expositions of the Psalms. The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century. John Rotelle (Ed.). New York: New City Press.
Brechtken, J. (1975). Augustinus Doctor Caritatis: Sein Liebesbegriff im Widerspruch von Eigennutz und selbstloser Güte im Rahmen der antiken Glückseligkeits-Ethik. Meisenheim: Verlag Anton Hain.
Burt, D. (1999). Friendship and Society: An Introduction to Augustine’s Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Eerdmans.
Canning, R. (1993). The Unity of Love for God and Neighbor in Saint Augustine. Heverlee-Leuven: Augustinian Historical Institute.
Cary, P. (2005). “United Inwardly by Love: Augustine’s Social Ontology”. In Doody, J., Hughes, K., and Paffenroth, K. (Eds.). Augustine and Politics, pp. 3-33. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Combes, G. (1934). La Charité d’aprés Saint Augustine. Paris: Bibliothèque Augustinienne.
Deane, H. (1963). The Political and Social Ideas of St. Augustine. New York: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/dean93962
Dideberg, D. (1994). “Amor”. In C. Mayer (Ed.). Augustinus-Lexikon, pp. 294-299. Vol. 1. Basel: Schwabe.
Dupont, A. (2004). Using or Enjoying Humans: Uti and Frui in Augustine. Augustiniana, 54(1), 475-506.
Dupont, A. (2019). “Augustine of Hippo as Politician: Political Practices at the Service of Christian Ideals”. In Dupont, A., Bendímez, E., and Villabona, C. (Eds.). Agustín de Hipona como Doctor Pacis: estudios sobre la paz en el mundo contemporáneo, pp. 10-34. Vol. 2. Bogotá: Editorial Uniagustiniana.
Fuhrer, T. (2002). “Familia, familiaris, familiaritas”. In C. Mayer (Ed.). Augustinus-Lexikon, pp.1236-1240. Vol. 2. Basel: Schwabe.
Gardner, J. (1998). Family and Familia in Roman Law and Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gardner, J., and Wiedemann, T. (1991). The Roman Household: A Sourcebook. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203324059
Gregory, E. (2008). Politics and the Order of Love: An Augustinian Ethic of Democratic Citizenship. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Hill, E. (1996). Teaching Christianity. The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century I/11. J. Rotelle (Ed.). New York: New City Press.
Hill, E. (2009). Homilies on the Gospel of John 1-40. The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century I/12. A. Fitzgerald (Ed.). New York: New City Press.
Hughes, K. (2005). “Local Politics: The Political Place of the Household in Augustine’s City of God”. In Doody, J., Hughes, K., and Paffenroth, K. (Eds.). Augustine and Politics, pp. 145-164. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Lepelley, C. (2007). Facing Wealth and Poverty: Defining Augustine’s Social Doctrine. Augustinian Studies, 38(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.5840/augstudies1988199
Lorenz, R. (1951). Fruitio Dei bei Augustin. Zeitschrift Kirchengeschichte, 63, 75- 132.
Markus, R. (1965). Two Conceptions of Political Authority: Augustine, De Ciuitate Dei, XIX. 14-15, and Some Thirteenth-Century Interpretations. The Journal of Theological Studies, 16(1), 68-100. https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/XVI.1.68
Markus, R. (1970). Saeculum: History and Society in the Theology of St. Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nathan, G. (2000). The Family in Late Antiquity: The Rise of Christianity and the Endurance of Tradition. London: Routledge.
Nussbaum, M. (2000). Duties of Justice, Duties of Material Aid: Cicero’s Problematic Legacy. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 8(2), 176-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00098
O’Donovan, O. (1982). Usus and Fruitio in Augustine, De Doctrina Christiana I. Journal of Theological Studies, 33(2), 361-397. https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/XXXIII.2.361
Parkin, T. (2011). “The Roman Life Course and the Family”. In B. Rawson (Ed.). A Companion to Families in the Greek and Roman Worlds, pp. 276-290. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444390766.ch17
Ramsey, B. (2008). Homilies on the First Epistle of John. The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century I/14. Doyle, D., and Martin, T. (Eds.). New York: New City Press.
Ruokanen, M. (1993). Theology of Social Life in Augustine’s De ciuitate Dei. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht. https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666551611
Saller, R. (1984). Familia, Domus, and the Roman Conception of the Family. Phoenix, 38(4), 336-355. https://doi.org/10.2307/1088380
Saller, R. (1986). Patria Potestas and the Stereotype of the Roman Family. Continuity and Change, 1(1), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0268416000000059
Shaw, B. (1987). The Family in Late Antiquity: The Experience of Augustine. Past and Present, 115(1), 3-51.
Swift, L. (1979). Iustitia and Ius Privatum: Ambrose on Private Property. The American Journal of Philology, 100(1), 176-187. https://doi.org/10.2307/294237
Teske, R. (2003). Letters 100-155: The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century II/2. B. Ramsey (Ed.). New York: New City Press.
Van Bavel, T. (1993). Fruitio, delectation and voluptas in Augustine. Augustinus 37, 499-510. https://doi.org/10.5840/augustinus199338149/15131
Van Bavel, T. (1999). “Love”. In A. Fitzgerald (Ed.). Augustine through the Ages: An Encyclopedia, pp. 509-516. Michigan: Grand Rapids.
Van Egmond, B. (2019). ““To be One Heart and Soul in God”: Augustine on Peace within the Family”. In Dupont, A., Bendímez, E., and Villabona, C. (Eds.). Agustín de Hipona como Doctor Pacis: estudios sobre la paz en el mundo contemporáneo, pp. 93-114. Vol. 2. Bogotá: Editorial Uniagustiniana. https://doi.org/10.28970/9789585498235.3
Von Heyking, J. (2001). Augustine and Politics as Longing in the World. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
Von Kamptz, H. (2010). Pater. TLL, 10(1), 677- 679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0450.1963.tb00224.x
Williams, R. (1987). Politics and the Soul: A Reading of the City of God. Milltown Studies, 19(20), 55-72.
Wood, N. (1991). Cicero’s Social and Political Thought. California: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520911284