Notes on a Method: Engaging with Augustine at the Intersection of Philosophy, Theology, and History
Article Sidebar
Downloads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article addresses the following question: Is it possible, and if so, to what extent, to draw upon sources from different contexts or disciplines to perform theological research? The first part describes the historical origins and contemporary application of the handmaiden model of theology (“philosophy is the handmaiden of theology,” philosophia ancilla theologiae). In the second section, I consider two closely related objections to this model, namely confirmation bias (or eisegesis) and anachronism. Section three demonstrates that while these objections should be carefully considered, they do not preclude altogether the possibility of engaging with sources across temporal or disciplinary boundaries. Gadamer’s hermeneutical philosophy grounds the possibility of such interaction. The remainder of the article provides a more specific vision of how this model can be practiced. First, I look to the theological tradition itself, in particular Augustine’s interpretive principles as applied to Genesis 1 (Confessiones 12) and Michael Fishbane’s appropriation of the Jewish hermeneutical tradition. Finally, the contemporary scholars William Desmond and Cyril O’Regan exemplify the responsible constructive engagement with the sources. I argue that practitioners of the handmaiden model must take seriously objections to and concerns about their methodology. Nonetheless, once critically adapted to present circumstances, this model is feasible for a contemporary scholarly context. One can respect the integrity of the sources while also interpreting them in ways which apply to present theological interests. A key implication of this research is that for each to function properly, historical theology and systematic theology must consistently interact with each other.
References
Aquinas, Thomas. (n.d.). New English Translation of St. Thomas Aquinas’s Summa Theologiae (Summa Theologica) (A. Freddoso, Trans.). https://www3.nd.edu/~afreddos/summa-translation/TOC-part1.htm.
Augustine. (2016). Confessions 9–13 (Vol. II, C. J.-B. Hammond, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Barnes, M. R. (1995). Augustine in Contemporary Trinitarian Theology. Theological Studies, 56 (2), 237–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/004056399505600202
Beer, V. de. (2012). The Patristic Reception of Hellenic Philosophy. St Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly, 55 (4), 373–98.
Bernstein, R. (1983). Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Praxis, and Hermeneutics. Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812205503
Beyers, J. (2016). How scientific is theology really? A matter of credibility. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 72 (4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v72i4.3449
Blakely, J. (2013). How Charles Taylor Philosophizes with History: A Review of Dilemmas and Connections. Journal of the Philosophy of History, 7, 231–43. https://doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341251
Bochet, I. (1998). “Non aliam esse philosophiam (...) et aliam religionem” (Augustin, De uer. rel. 5, 8). In B. Pouderon and J. Doré (Eds.), Les Apologistes chrétiens et la culture grecque, Théologie historique, 105 (pp. 333–53). Paris: Beauchesne.
Cameron, M. (1986). “The Christological Substructure of Augustine’s Exegesis.” In P. Bright (Ed. and trans.) and A.-M. la Bonnardière (Ed.), Augustine and the Bible, Bible de tous les temps, 3 (pp. 74–103). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Collingwood, R. G. (1958). The Principles of Art. London, Oxford, and New York: Oxford University Press.
Cushman, R. (2002). Therapeia: Plato’s Conception of Philosophy. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.
Danto, A. C. (1956). On Explanations in History. Philosophy of Science, 23 (1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1086/287457
Desmond, W. (2003). Art, Origins, and Otherness: Between Philosophy and Art. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Desmond, W. (2009). Despoiling the Egyptians–Gently: Merold Westphal and Hegel. In B. Putt (Ed.), Gazing Through a Prism Darkly: Reflections on Merold Westphal’s Hermeneutical Epistemology (pp. 20-34). New York: Fordham University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt13wzzv5.5
Fishbane, M. (2008). Sacred Attunement: A Jewish Theology. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226251745.001.0001
Fisichella, R. (1995). Oportet philosophari in theologia (I): Delineazione di un sentiero per una valutazione del rapporto tra teologia e filosofia. Gregorianum, 76 (2), 221–262.
Folliet, G. (2002). « La spoliatio aegyptiorum » (Exode 3:21-23; 11:2-3; 12:35-36): les interprétations de cette image chez les pères et autres écrivains ecclésiastiques. Traditio, 57, 1-48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0362152900002683
Fortin-Melkevik, A. (1993). Deux paradigmes pour penser le rapport de la théologie aux sciences humaines : herméneutique et narratologie. Laval théologique et philosophique, 49 (2), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.7202/400767ar
Frei, H. (1974). The Eclipse of Biblical Narrative: A Study in Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century Hermeneutics. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1986–1995). Gesammelte Werke (10 volumes). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Gadamer, H.-G., and Grondin, J. (2006). Looking Back with Gadamer on his Writings and their Effective History: A Dialogue with Jean Grondin. Theory, Culture & Society, 23 (1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276406063230
Gadamer, H.-G. (2013). Truth and Method (J. Weinsheimer & D. Marshall, Trans.; 2nd. rev. ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Gaut, B. (1993). Interpreting the Arts: The Patchwork Theory. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 51 (4), 597-609. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540_6245.jaac51.4.0597
Gregory, B. (2012). The Unintended Reformation: How a Religious Revolution Secularized Society. Cambridge, MA and London, England: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674062580
Grondin, J. (2003). The Philosophy of Gadamer (K. Plant Trans.), Continental European Philosophy. Chesham, UK: Acumen. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781844653430
Grondin, J. (2006). La thèse de l’herméneutique sur l’être. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 4, 469–81. https://doi.org/10.3917/rmm.064.0469
Harrison, C. (1992). Beauty and Revelation in the Thought of St. Augustine. Oxford: Clarendon. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198263425.001.0001
Holston, R. R. (2014). Two Concepts of Prejudice. History of Political Thought, 35 (1), 174–203.
Köckert, C. (2016). Augustine and Nebridius (Augustine, epp. 3-14): Two Christian Intellectuals and Their Project of a Philosophical Life. Revue d’études augustiniennes et patristiques, 62, 235–62. https://doi.org/10.1484/J.REA.4.2017034
Lamarque, P. (2010). Work and Object: Explorations in the Metaphysics of Art. Oxford: University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577460.001.0001
Lawrence, F. (2000). Ontology of and as Horizon: Gadamer’s Rehabilitation of the Metaphysics of Light. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia, 56 (3/4), 389–420.
Levinson, J. (1990). Music, Art, and Metaphysics: Essays in Philosophical Aesthetics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Löhr, W. (2010). Christianity as Philosophy: Problems and Perspectives of an Ancient Intellectual Project. Vigiliae Christianae, 64, 160–88. https://doi.org/10.1163/157007209X453331
MacDonald, P. A. (2010). The Epistemology of Faith in Augustine and Aquinas. In P. Cary, J. Doody, and K. Paffenroth (Eds.), Augustine and Philosophy (pp. 167–96). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Madec, G. (1998). Chez Augustin. Paris : Institut d’Études Augustiniennes.
Matthews, G. (2008). Augustine on Reading Scripture as Doing Philosophy. Augustinian Studies, 39, 145-162. https://doi.org/10.5840/augstudies200839215
Michalewski, A. (2014). La puissance de l’intelligible : La théorie plotinienne des Formes au miroir de l’héritage médioplatonicien. Leuven: University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt14jxskd
Mowbray, M. de. (2004). “Philosophy as Handmaid of Theology: Biblical Exegesis in the Service of Scholarship.” Traditio, 59, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S036215290000252X
Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises. Review of General Psychology, 2 (2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
Niel, H. (1966). “The Old and the New in Theology: Rahner and Lonergan.” CrossCurrents, 16 (4), 463–80.
O’Donnell, J. (1992). Augustine: Confessions (Vols. I-III). Oxford: Clarendon. Recovered from https://www.stoa.org/hippo/
O’Regan, C. (2012). Answering Back: Augustine’s Critique of Heidegger. In F. O’Rourke (Ed.), Human Destinies: Philosophical Essays in Memory of Gerald Hanratty (pp. 134–84). South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Pelikan, J. (1966). An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine. Church History: Studies in Christianity and Culture, 35 (1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.2307/3162668
Percival, P. (2000). Stecker’s Dilemma: A Constructive Response. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 58 (1), 51-61. https://doi.org/10.2307/432349
Pessin, A. and Engel, S. (2015). The Study of Philosophy: A Text with Readings. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Pollmann, K. (2007). Augustine, Genesis, and Controversy. Augustinian Studies, 38, 203–16. https://doi.org/10.5840/augstudies200738113
Praet, D. (2020). Augustine of Hippo and Michel Foucault’s History of Sexuality. In A. Dupont, W. François, and J. Leemans (Eds.), Nos sumus tempora: Studies on Augustine and his Reception Offered to Mathijs Lamberigts (pp. 213-35). Leuven, Paris, and Bristol, CT: Peeters. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1q26x87.15
Riel, Gerd van. (2007). Augustine’s Exegesis of “Heaven and Earth” in Conf. XII: Finding Truth amidst Philosophers, Heretics and Exegetes. Quaestio, 7, 191–228. https://doi.org/10.1484/J.QUAESTIO.1.100154
Riel, G. van. (2012). La sagesse chez Augustin : de la philosophie à l’Écriture. In I. Bochet (Ed.), Augustin philosophe et prédicateur. Hommage à Goulven Madec (pp. 389–405). Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes.
Rist, J. (1994). Augustine: Ancient Thought Baptized. Cambridge: University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520228
Schumacher, L. (2011). Divine Illumination: The History and Future of Augustine’s Theory of Knowledge. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444395099
Scraire, M. (2007). L’événement de la compréhension et la tâche herméneutique selon Hans-Georg Gadamer dans Vérité et Méthode. Phares : Revue Philosophique Étudiante de l’Université Laval, 7, 233–51.
Star, C. (2017). Seneca. London: I.B. Tauris. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350987999
Stecker, R. (2003). Interpretation and Construction: Art, Speech, and the Law. Malden, MA: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470776186
Taylor, C. (2002). Gadamer on the Human Sciences. In R. Dostal (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer (pp. 126–42). Cambridge: University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521801931.007
Ticciati, S. (2013). A New Apophaticism: Augustine and the Redemption of Signs. Leiden and Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004258143
Wachterhauser, B. R. (1988). Prejudice, Reason and Force. Philosophy, 63, 231–53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100043382
Wedgwood, R. (2007). The Nature of Normativity. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199251315.001.0001
Weinsheimer, J. (1985). Gadamer’s Hermeneutics: A Reading of Truth and Method. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.
Young, F. (2005). The “Mind” of Scripture: Theological Readings of the Bible in the Fathers. International Journal of Systematic Theology, 7 (2), 126–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2400.2005.00156.x
Zimmermann, J. (2004). Recovering Theological Hermeneutics: An Incarnational-Trinitarian Theory of Interpretation. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.