Contribution of contextual analysis to biblical exegesis
Main Article Content
Abstract
The methodological turn that took place during the decade of the 1980s in the field of biblical exegesis enhanced the traditional perspective of historical-critical analysis by proposing a study of biblical texts from a literary and contextual standpoint. The article introduces the assumptions and method of contextual analysis, which turns to different social sciences to reconstruct the social settings of the texts. To explain such a method, the article reconstructs the reading scenario posited by the healing accounts of the Gospels.
References
Aguado, P. (2011). La teoría de la abducción de Peirce: lógica, metodología e instinto. Ideas y Valores 145, pp. 33-53.
Avalos, H. (1999). Health Care and the Rise of Christianity. Peabody.
Elliott, J. H. (1993). What is Social-Scientific Criticism?. Minneapolis.
Estévez López, E. (2003). El poder de una mujer creyente: cuerpo, identidad y discipulado en Mc 5,24b-34. Estella.
Funk, R. W. (1976). The Watershed of the American Biblical Tradition: The Chicago School, First Phase, 1892-1920. Journal of Biblical Literature 95, pp. 4-22.
Garnsey P. & Saller , R . (1991). El imperio romano. Economía, sociedad y cultura. Barcelona.
Gilmore D. D., ed. (1987). Honor and Shame and the Unity of the Mediterranean. Washington D.C.
Gilmore, D. D. (1982). Anthropology of the Mediterranean Area. Annual Review of Anthropology 11, pp. 175-205.
Good, B. & Delvecchio Good, M.-J. (1980). The Meaning of Symptoms. A Cultural Hermeneutic Model for Clinical Practice. En L. Eisenberg - A. Kleinman (eds.), The Relevance of Social Science for Medicine. Drodrecht - Boston -Lancaster, pp. 165-196.
Graham, A. (1994). Sage, Saint and Sophist. London-New York.
Green, W. S. (1979). Palestinian Holy Men: Charismatic Leadership and Rabbinic Tradition. En H. T. Haase (ed.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II, 19.2. Berlin / New York, pp. 619-647.
Guijarro, S. (1996). La Biblia y la Antropología Cultural. Medellín 88, pp. 85-105.
Guijarro, S. (2007). Jesús y sus primeros discípulos. Estella.
Guijarro, S. (2012). Los cuatro evangelios, 2 ed. Salamanca.
Hall, E. T. (1989). El lenguaje silencioso. Madrid.
Hogan, L. P. (1992). Healing in the Second Temple Period. Freiburg.
Kleinman, A. (1980). Patients and Healers in the Context of Culture. An Exploration of the Borderland between Anthropology, Medicine and Psychiatry. Berkeley.
Lenski, G. (1969). Poder y privilegio. Barcelona.
Malina, B. J. (1991a). Interpretation. Reading, Abduction, Metaphor. En D. Jobling (ed.), The Bible and the Politics of Exegesis. Essays in Honor of Norman Gottwald. Cleveland, pp. 253-268.
Malina, B.J. (1991b). Reading Theory Perspective. Reading Luke-Acts. En J. H. Neyrey (ed.), The Social World of Luke-Acts. Models for Interpretation. Massachussets, pp. 3-23.
McKnight, E. V. (1969). What is Form Criticism?. Philadelphia.
Miquel, E. (2011). El Nuevo Testamento desde las ciencias sociales. Estella.
Noorda, S. (1979). Illness and Sin, Forgiving and Healing. The Connection of Medical Treatment and Religious Beliefs in Ben Sira 38,1-15. En M. J. Vermaseren (ed.), Studies in Hellenistic Religions. Leiden, pp. 215-224.
Peristiany D. J. G., (ed.). (1966). Honor and Shame. The Values of the Mediterranean Society. Chicago.
Pilch, J. J. (1991). Sickness and Healing in Luke-Acts. En J. Neyrey (ed.), The Social World of Luke-Acts. Models for Interpretation . Massachusetts, pp. 181-209.
Pilch J. J. (2000). Healing in the New Testament. Insights from Medical and Mediterranean Anthropology. Philadelphia.
Rhoads D. & Dewey J. & Michie, D. (2002). Marcos como relato. Salamanca.
Ricoeur, P. (1995). Teoría de la interpretación. Discurso y excedente de sentido. México D.F.
Seybold K. & Mueller, U. B . (1978). Sickness and Healing. Nashville.
Sjoberg, G. (1960). ThePreindustrial City. New York.
Vermes, G. (1997). Jesús el judío, 4 ed. Barcelona.
Wolf, E. R. (1971). Los campesinos. Barcelona.