Lung cancer: endoscopic diagnosis vs pathological diagnosis
Article Sidebar
How to Cite
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Author Biographies
Carlos Eduardo Orduz García, Pontifical Bolivarian University
Internist Pulmonologist and Endoscopist. Professor of Internal Medicine and Pulmonology at the Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana. Academic Coordinator - Hospital la María 1981-1987.
Fernando Gutiérrez Mendoza, University of Antioquia
Pathologist. Associate Professor of Pathology at the University of Antioquia. Departmental Medical Laboratory.
Martha Luz Jaramillo Vásquez, Departmental Medical Laboratory
Medical Pathologist Departmental Medical Laboratory.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity of biopsies and cytologies carried out on vegetant bronchogenic tumoral masses viewed on bronchoscopy. Thirty four patients were evaluated between September 1986 and January 1987 in La Maria Hospital, Medellín. Four biopsies were taken and then bronchial brushing was carried out; these were then analysed in the Regional Medical Laboratory (Laboratorio Médico Departamental). The diagnosis was confirmed in 100% of the cases with either of the two methods. Biopsy was more sensitive in confirming the diagnosis (32 cases - 94%) than citology (16 cases -47%). In conclusión, the combination of four biopsies and a citology obtained through bronchial brushings provide an excellent diagnostic security for central bronchial tumors.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Gustavo Matute Turizo, Martha Luz Jaramillo Vásquez, Cytology as a diagnostic aid , Medicina UPB: Vol. 16 No. 1 (1997): January - June
- Carlos Eduardo Orduz García, Fernando Gutiérrez Mendoza, Cáncer broncogénico. Presentación de 95 casos , Medicina UPB: Vol. 14 No. 2 (1995): July - December