Preliminary experience in the use of fertility charting in a cohort of infertility patients at a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Article Sidebar
How to Cite
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Author Biographies
José Antonio Arraztoa, University of the Andes
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Universidad de los Andes.
Manuel Donoso, University of the Andes
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Universidad de los Andes.
Horacio Figueroa, University of the Andes
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Universidad de los Andes.
Benjamín Bustos, University of the Andes
Residents of the training program in obstetrics and gynecology at the Universidad de los Andes.
Javiera Valdivieso, University of the Andes
Residents of the training program in obstetrics and gynecology at the Universidad de los Andes.
Ximena Maella, Fertility Recognition Method. Procef
Instructor midwives of the Fertility Recognition Method. Procef.
María Teresa Gana, Fertility Recognition Method. Procef
Instructor midwives of the Fertility Recognition Method. Procef.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: to study the results in patients undergoing infertility treatment with a focus on restorative medicine (NaProTechnology) at a department of obstetrics and gynecology.
Methodology: retrospective cohort study conducted by the gynecology and obstetrics department at Universidad de los Andes (Santiago, Chile) in infertility patients from a suburban area of Santiago de Chile, who received treatment between 2006 and 2014. All couples received instructions on how to recognize their fertility period according to a local teaching model based on the Creighton Model FertilityCare System. They also received medical treatment to induce ovulation and/or widen their fertile period, or surgical treatment. The main outcome was the number of pregnancies.
Results: 131 patients received instructions. The mean age was 33.6 years. Seventyeight patients (59.5%) consulted due to primary infertility; 53 (40.5%) due to secondary infertility. The duration of group infertility was 4.1 years. The mean use of the method was 12.6 months (median, 9 months). The infertility causes identified included anovulation (50.4%), tubo-peritoneal factors (18.3%), endometriosis (14.5%), uterine factors (9.2%), cervical factors (8.4%) and masculine factors (19.1%). There were 33 pregnancies (25.2 global). The crude proportion of pregnancies at 24 months was 22.9% and the proportion adjusted by the life table at 24 months was 40 per 100 couples.
Conclusions: the focus on restorative medicine is effective to achieve pregnancy but it requires a long-term longitudinal treatment. Early discontinuation of fertility charting affects the efficacy of this focus. More research is warranted to optimize medical treatment.
References
Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine in collaboration with Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility. Optimizing natural fertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):631-7.
Guzick D. Human infertility: an introduction In: Adashi EY Rock J, Rosenwacks Z, editors. Reproductive, Endocrinology, Surgery and Technology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1996.
Hilgers T. What is NaProTechnology? . In: Hilgers T, editor. The medical and surgical practice of NaProTechnology. Omaha, NE. USA: Pope Paul VI Institute Press; 2004.
Hilgers TW, Prebil AM. The ovulation method--vulvar observations as an index of fertility/ infertility. Obstet Gynecol. 1979;53(1):12-22.
Hilgers TW, Stanford JB. Creighton Model NaProEducation Technology for avoiding pregnancy. Use effectiveness. J Reprod Med. 1998;43(6):495-502.
Stanford JB, White GL, Hatasaka H. Timing intercourse to achieve pregnancy: current evidence. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100(6):1333-41.
Tham E, Schliep K, Stanford J. Natural procreative technology for infertility and recurrent miscarriage: outcomes in a Canadian family practice. Can Fam Physician. 2012;58(5):e267-74.
Stanford JB, Parnell TA, Boyle PC. Outcomes from treatment of infertility with natural procreative technology in an Irish general practice. J Am Board Fam Med. 2008;21(5):375-84.