Preliminary experience in the use of fertility charting in a cohort of infertility patients at a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Main Article Content

José Antonio Arraztoa
Manuel Donoso
Horacio Figueroa
Benjamín Bustos
Javiera Valdivieso
Ximena Maella
María Teresa Gana

Abstract

Objective: to study the results in patients undergoing infertility treatment with a focus on restorative medicine (NaProTechnology) at a department of obstetrics and gynecology.


Methodology: retrospective cohort study conducted by the gynecology and obstetrics department at Universidad de los Andes (Santiago, Chile) in infertility patients from a suburban area of Santiago de Chile, who received treatment between 2006 and 2014. All couples received instructions on how to recognize their fertility period according to a local teaching model based on the Creighton Model FertilityCare System. They also received medical treatment to induce ovulation and/or widen their fertile period, or surgical treatment. The main outcome was the number of pregnancies.


Results: 131 patients received instructions. The mean age was 33.6 years. Seventyeight patients (59.5%) consulted due to primary infertility; 53 (40.5%) due to secondary infertility. The duration of group infertility was 4.1 years. The mean use of the method was 12.6 months (median, 9 months). The infertility causes identified included anovulation (50.4%), tubo-peritoneal factors (18.3%), endometriosis (14.5%), uterine factors (9.2%), cervical factors (8.4%) and masculine factors (19.1%). There were 33 pregnancies (25.2 global). The crude proportion of pregnancies at 24 months was 22.9% and the proportion adjusted by the life table at 24 months was 40 per 100 couples.


Conclusions: the focus on restorative medicine is effective to achieve pregnancy but it requires a long-term longitudinal treatment. Early discontinuation of fertility charting affects the efficacy of this focus. More research is warranted to optimize medical treatment.

Keywords:
infertility, fertility, pregnancy, longitudinal studies

References

Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine in collaboration with Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility. Optimizing natural fertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):631-7.

Guzick D. Human infertility: an introduction In: Adashi EY Rock J, Rosenwacks Z, editors. Reproductive, Endocrinology, Surgery and Technology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1996.

Hilgers T. What is NaProTechnology? . In: Hilgers T, editor. The medical and surgical practice of NaProTechnology. Omaha, NE. USA: Pope Paul VI Institute Press; 2004.

Hilgers TW, Prebil AM. The ovulation method--vulvar observations as an index of fertility/ infertility. Obstet Gynecol. 1979;53(1):12-22.

Hilgers TW, Stanford JB. Creighton Model NaProEducation Technology for avoiding pregnancy. Use effectiveness. J Reprod Med. 1998;43(6):495-502.

Stanford JB, White GL, Hatasaka H. Timing intercourse to achieve pregnancy: current evidence. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100(6):1333-41.

Tham E, Schliep K, Stanford J. Natural procreative technology for infertility and recurrent miscarriage: outcomes in a Canadian family practice. Can Fam Physician. 2012;58(5):e267-74.

Stanford JB, Parnell TA, Boyle PC. Outcomes from treatment of infertility with natural procreative technology in an Irish general practice. J Am Board Fam Med. 2008;21(5):375-84.