Efficacy of combined treatment with cyclophosphamide and glucocorticoids in paraquat poisoning mortality. A meta-analysis

Main Article Content

Luz Ángela Angarita Fuentes
Gloria Lucía Lema Zuluaga
María Victoria Restrepo Ceballos
Claudia Lucía Arroyave Hoyos

Abstract

Objective: systematic review to update evidence about whether the combined use of cyclophosphamide and intravenous glucocorticoids in adults with moderate to severe paraquat poisoning compared to conventional treatment, decreases the 30- day mortality rate in randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials.


Methods: search in electronic databases, abstracts from scientific conferences, references in relevant articles and contact with experts. Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials on adult paraquat poisoning were included comparing this regimen with conventional treatment. Full text reviewed if they met inclusion criteria. Duplicate trials excluded. Two separate authors extracted data and double tool entrance data from ReviewManager® 5 was used.


Results: three randomized controlled trials identified (n=93) with acceptable methodology for meta-analysis. Intervention group mortality was 25% (12/47) vs. 67% (31/46) for control group and risk-ratio 0.35 (IC95%: 0.21-0.61). Cochran´s Q test p= 0.93 and I2 0% suggesting homogeneity. According to this, a fixed effects model was used. Sensitivity analysis performed with random-effect yielding similar results to fixed effects model suggesting robust results. Therapy adverse events were leukopenia with no infections (37%), acne, hair loss and hyperglycemia. Small number of studies, so the power to detect publication bias was not reached.


Conclusions: results suggest immunosuppressive therapy is effective in decreasing mortality risk in adults with moderate to severe paraquat poisoning. Use of this therapy regimen is recommended.

Keywords:
paraquat, cyclophosphamide, methylprednisolone, dexamethasone, glucocorticoids

Article Details

Author Biographies

Luz Ángela Angarita Fuentes, University of Antioquia

Master student in Clinical Research, University of Antioquia. Medellin Colombia.

Gloria Lucía Lema Zuluaga, Universidad CES

MD, CES University. Research Unit, Pablo Tobón Uribe Hospital. Medellín, Colombia.

María Victoria Restrepo Ceballos, Pontifical Bolivarian University

Internist Physician, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana. Clinical Management and Medical Audit Department Chief, Pablo Tobón Uribe Hospital. Medellín, Colombia.

Claudia Lucía Arroyave Hoyos, University of Antioquia

Clinical Toxicologist. Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Antioquia. Professor of the Basic Sciences Unit, CES University. Medellín, Colombia.

References

Talbot A. Paraquat and diquat. In: Brent J, Wallace KL, Burkhart KK, Phillips SD, Donovan JW. Critical care toxicology: diagnosis and management of the critically poisoned patient. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2005. p. 947–961.

Lee HL, Lin HJ, Yeh ST, Chi CH, Guo HR. Presentations of patients of poisoning and predictors of poisoningrelated fatality: findings from a hospital-based prospective study. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:7.

Riegel W, Seyffart G . Paraquat. In: Poison Index. The treatment of acute intoxication. Lengerich (Germany): Pabst Science Publishers;1997. p. 535 – 545.

Bus JS. Cagen SZ. Olgaar M, Gibson JE. A mechanism of paraquat toxicity in mice rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1976;35: 505-513.

Fairshter RD. Paraquat toxicity and lipid peroxidation. Arch 15 Agarwal R, Srinivas R, Aggarwal AN, Gupta D. Immunosuppressive therapy in lung injury due to paraquat poisoning: a meta-analysis. Singapore Med J. 2007;48(11): 1000-1005. 16 Hart TB, Nevitt A, Whitehead A. A new statistical approach to the prognostic significance of plasma concentration. Lancet. 1984;2:1222-1223. Intern Med. 1981;141:1121-1122.

Dinis-Oliveira RJ, Duarte JA, Sánchez-Navarro A, Remião F, Bastos ML, Carvalho F. Paraquat poisonings: mechanisms of lung toxicity, clinical features, and treatment. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2008; 38:13–71.

Hong SY, Yang JO, Lee EY, Kim SH. Effect of haemoperfusion on plasma paraquat concentration in vitro and in vivo. Toxicol Ind Health. 2003;19:17-23.

Nagao M, Takatori T, Wu K, Terazawa H, Gotouda H, Akabane H. Immunotherapy for the treatment of acute paraquat poisoning. Human Toxicol. 1989;8:121-3.

Talbot AR, Barner MR. Radiotherapy for the treatment of pulmonary complications of paraquat poisoning. Human Toxicol. 1988;7:325-32.

Addo E, Poon-King T. Leucocyte supression in treatment of 72 patients with paraquat poisoning. Lancet. 1986; 1: 1117-1120.

Lin JL, Leu ML, Liu YC, Chen GH. A Prospective clinical trial of pulse therapy with glucocorticoid and cyclophosphamide in moderate to severe paraquatpoisoned patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159:357-360.

Lin JL, Lin-Tan DT, Chen KH, Huang WH. Repeated pulse of methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide with continuous dexamethasone therapy for patients with severe paraquat poisoning. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(2):368-373.

Afzali S, Gholyaf M. The effectiveness of combined treatment with methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide in oral paraquat poisoning. Arch Iran Med. 2008;11(4):387-391.

Perriëns JH, Benimadho S, Kiauw IL, Wisse J, Chee H. High-dose cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in paraquat poisoning: a prospective study. Hum Exp Toxicol.1992 Mar;11(2):129-34.

Agarwal R, Srinivas R, Aggarwal AN, Gupta D. Immunosuppressive therapy in lung injury due to paraquat poisoning: a meta-analysis. Singapore Med J. 2007;48(11): 1000-1005.

Hart TB, Nevitt A, Whitehead A. A new statistical approach to the prognostic significance of plasma concentration. Lancet. 1984;2:1222-1223.

Youshida T, Tanaka M, Sotomatsu A, Okamoto K. Effect of methylprednisolone pulse therapy on superoxide production of neutrophils. Neurol Res. 1999; 21:509- 12.

Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.0 [computer program]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Nordic CochraneCentre,Cochrane Collaboration; 2008.