Validation and reliability of the Academic Procrastination Scale in university students in Peru

Main Article Content

Manuel Enrique Chenet Zuta
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2088-2541
Rigoberto León Sánchez
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0838-3507
Jorge Luis Montes Domínguez
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1018-6430
Zuraya Monroy Nasr
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3837-5735
Fernando Flores Camacho
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6165-4946

Abstract

Academic procrastination is defined as a difficulty in self-regulation processes that leads to the voluntary delay of planned activities, even when a worse situation is anticipated as a consequence of the delay; it has negative consequences, thus information about it is needed. The objective of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Academic Procrastination Scale (Busko, 1998) in the version adapted by Álvarez (2010). The study involved 343 university students in Peru from various degree programs aged between 18 and 25 years. The 16-item scale was administered online after obtaining the participants’ informed consent. The results showed that the scale had the same structure as the original but with 8 items, with an adequate fit and good reliability (ordinal α = .86). In conclusion, a version with evidence of reliability and construct validity to measure academic procrastination was obtained.

Keywords:
Reliability, Measurement, Academic procrastination, University students, Validity

Article Details

References

Álvarez, O. (2010). Procrastinación general y académica en una muestra de estudiantes de secundaria de Lima metropolitana. Revista Persona, 13, 159- 177. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/1471/147118212009.pdf

American Psychological Association [APA]. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, amended effective June 1, 2010, and January 1, 2017). https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/

Busko, D. (1998). Causes and consequences of perfectionism and procrastination: A structural equation model [Tesis de maestría no publicada, University of Guelph].

Domínguez, S.A. (2016). Datos normativos de la Escala de Procrastinación Académica en estudiantes de psicología de Lima. Revista Evaluar, 16(1), 20-30. https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v16.n1.15715

Edwards, M. C. y Wirth, R. J. (2009). Measurement and the study of change. Research in Human Development, 6(2-3), 74-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427600902911163

González-Brignardello, M. P. y Sánchez-Elvira-Paniagua, Á. (2013). ¿Puede amortiguar el Engagement los efectos nocivos de la procrastinación académica? Acción Psicológica, 10(1), 115-134. https://revistas.uned.es/index.php/accionpsicologica/article/view/7039

Guerra, F. E. y Jorquera, R.A. (2024). Propiedades psicométricas de la escala de procrastinación académica en universitarios chilenos. Formación Universitaria, 17(3), 47-56. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0718-50062024000300047

Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 2307-0919. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/orpc/vol2/iss1/8/

Hong, J. C., Lee, Y. F. y Ye, J. H. (2021). Procrastination predicts online self-regulated learning and online learning ineffectiveness during the coronavirus lockdown. Personality and Individual Differences, 174, 110673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110673

Hu, L. T. y Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Kenny, D. A. y Milan, S. (2012). Identification: A nontechnical discussion of a technical issue. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp.145–163). Guilford Press.

Ledesma, R. D., Ferrando, P. J. y Tosi, J. D. (2019). Uso del análisis factorial exploratorio en RIDEP. recomendaciones para autores y revisores. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación, RIDEP, 52(3), 173-180. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP52.3.13

Ley general de protección de datos personales en posesión de sujetos obligados. Diario Oficial de la Federación [DOF], 26 de enero de 2017, (México). https://www.gob.mx/indesol/documentos/ley-general-de-proteccion-de-datos-personales-en-posesion-de-sujetos-obligados

Losada, A.V., Zambrano-Villalba, C. y Marmo, J. (2022). Clasificación de métodos de investigación en psicología. Revista Psicología UNEMI, 6(11), 13-31. https://doi.org/10.29076/issn.2602-8379vol6iss11.2022pp13-31p

Marinoni, G. y van’t Land, H. (2020). The Impact of COVID-19 on Global Higher Education. International Higher Education, 102, 7–9. https://ejournals.bc.edu/index.php/ihe/article/view/14593

Matsumoto, D. (2001). Culture and Emotion. In D. Matsumoto (Ed.), The handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 171–194). Oxford University Press.

Montero, I. y León, O. G. (2007). A guide for naming research studies in psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7(3), 847–862. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/337/33770318.pdf

Morata-Ramírez, M. A., Holgado-Tello, F. P., Barbero-García, I. y Méndez, G. (2015). Análisis factorial confirmatorio: recomendaciones sobre mínimos cuadrados no ponderados en función del error Tipo I de Ji-Cuadrado y RMSEA. Acción Psicológica, 12(1), 79-90. https://revistas.uned.es/index.php/accionpsicologica/article/view/14362

Ordorika, I. (2020). Pandemia y educación superior. Revista de la Educación Superior, 194(49), 1-8. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346938048_Pandemia_y_educacion_superior

Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02

Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65

Steel, P. y Ferrari, J. (2013). Sex, education and procrastination: an epidemiological study of procrastinators' characteristics from a global sample. European Journal of Personality, 27(1), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1851

Tabachnick, B. y Fidell, L. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (5.a ed.). Pearson.

Trizano, I. y Alvarado, J. M. (2016). Best alternatives to Cronbach's Alpha reliability in realistic conditions: Congeneric and asymmetrical measurements. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 769. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00769

Trujillo, K. y Noé, M. (2020). La Escala de procrastinación académica (EPA): validez y confiabilidad en una muestra de estudiantes peruanos. Revista de Psicología y Educación, 15(1), 98-107. https://doi.org/10.23923/rpye2020.01.189

Valenzuela, R., Codina, N., Castillo, I. y Pestana, J. V. (2020). Young university students’ academic self-regulation profiles and their associated procrastination: Autonomous functioning requires self-regulated operations. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 354. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00354

West, S. G., Taylor, A. B. y Wu, W. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. En R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling (pp. 209-231). Guilford Press.

Whittaker, A. (2012). Research skills for social work. (2.a ed.). Sage. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/research-skills-for-social-work/book238813

Ziegler, N. y Opdenakker, M. C. (2018). The development of academic procrastination in first-year secondary education students: The link with metacognitive self-regulation, self-efficacy, and effort regulation. Learning and Individual Differences, 64, 71-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.04.009

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)