The Authentic Person’s Limited Bad Faith. A Sartrean Perspective

Main Article Content

Sarah Horton
Leandro Sánchez Marín
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6837-1081

Abstract

Drawing on Sartre’s account of violence, I argue that not only is bad faith inevitable in practice, but a limited bad faith is necessary for authenticity. Although violating the freedom of others is bad faith, it is impossible to never violate anyone’s freedom. Moreover, and more fundamentally, the ontological structure of the for- itself entails that the for-itself can only be authentic in the mode of not being authentic. Seeking to altogether avoid bad faith is bad faith, for it is an attempt to constitute oneself as essentially authentic, yet the for-itself has no preexisting essence. By recognizing one’s complete responsibility for choosing bad faith, however, one limits one’s bad faith. This limited bad faith is in fact necessary to authenticity, which is a project lived out in concrete situations and not a categorical moral law that forbids bad faith.

Keywords:
Authenticity, Bad Faith, Freedom, Responsibility, Violence

References

Birchall, Ian. (2005). “Sartre on Terror”. Sartre Studies International, Vol. 11, nos. 1-2 (2005): 251-64.

Detmer, David. Freedom as a Value. A Critique of the Ethical Theory of Jean-Paul Sartre. Chicago: Open Court, 1986.

Eshleman, Matthew and Ronald Santoni. “Is Violence Necessarily in Bad Faith? Liberatory Violence, Bad Faith, and Moral Justification: A Reply”. Sartre Studies International, Vol. 22, no. 2 (2015): 59-84.

Fleming, Michael. “Sartre on Violence: Not So Ambivalent?”. Sartre Studies International, Vol. 17, no. 1 (2011): 20-40.

La Caze, Marguerite. “Sartre Integrating Ethics and Politics: The Case of Terrorism”. Parrhesia, Vol. 3 (2007): 43-54.

Santoni, Ronald. Sartre on Violence. Curiously Ambivalent. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2003.

Santoni, Ronald. “The Bad Faith of Violence-and Is Sartre in Bad Faith Regarding It?”. Sartre Studies International, Vol. 11, nos. 1-2 (2005): 62-77.

Santoni, Ronald. “Concerning the Ambivalence of Sartre on Violence: A Commentary/Rejoinder”. Sartre Studies International, Vol. 19, no. 2 (2013): 112-28.

Sartre, Jean-Paul. “Qu’est-ce que la littérature”. In Situations II. Qu’est-ce que la littérature? Paris: Gallimard, 1948: 55-330.

Sartre, Jean-Paul. L’Existentialisme est un humanisme. Paris: Les Éditions Nagel, 1968.

Sartre, Jean-Paul. L’Être et le néant. Paris: Gallimard, 1976.

Sartre, Jean-Paul. Cahiers pour une morale. Paris: Gallimard, 1983.

Sartre, Jean-Paul. What Is Literature? and Other Essays. Traduction by Bernard Frechtman. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1988.

Sartre, Jean-Paul. Being and Nothingness. Traduction by Hazel E. Barnes. New York: Washington Square Press, 1992a.

Sartre, Jean-Paul. Notebooks for an Ethics. Traduction by David Pellauer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992b.

Sartre, Jean-Paul. Existentialism Is a Humanism. Traduction by Carol Macomber. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007.