Impacto en los resultados en salud de la telesalud aplicada para la atención y seguimiento ambulatorio del alto riesgo obstétrico: revisión narrativa de la literatura
Barra lateral del artículo
Descargas
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Esta revisión examina la literatura sobre el impacto de la telesalud aplicada en modelos de atención en salud ambulatorios sobre los resultados en salud (funcionales, costos, satisfacción y calidad de vida) en población gestante de alto riesgo. Dada la heterogeneidad en los métodos de estudio, las tecnologías utilizadas y las medidas de resultado, los resultados se analizaron y presentaron en una descripción general narrativa de la literatura. Se concluye que la implementación de esos modelos es factible en términos técnicos y podrían representar un ahorro de costos para el proveedor de servicio y las pacientes. Sin embargo, se requiere más claridad sobre los desenlaces clínicos, con evidencia de alta calidad, para que las políticas que habilitan dichos servicios evolucionen al ritmo de la tecnología.
Citas
van den Heuvel JFM, Teunis CJ, Franx A, Crombag NMTH, Bekker MN. Home-based telemonitoring versus hospital admission in high-risk pregnancies: A qualitative study on women’s experiences. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):77:2779-4
Artal-Mittelmark R. Factores de riesgo para el embarazo de alto riesgo [Internet]. Manual MSD versión para público general. [cited 2024 Jan 16]. Disponible en: https://www.msdmanuals.com/es-co/hogar/salud-femenina/embarazo-de-alto-riesgo/factores-de-riesgo-para-el-embarazode-alto-riesgo
Health system performance assessment [Internet]. Who.int. World Health Organization; 2022 [citado el 16 de enero de 2024]. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240042476
Olry de Labry Lima A, García Mochón L, Bermúdez Tamayo C. Identification of health outcome indicators in primary care. A review of systematic reviews. Rev Calid Asist. 2017;32(5):278–88.
García Alcaraz F, Alfaro Espín A, Moreno Sotos JL. Evaluación de resultados de salud: panorama sobre el uso de medidas de resultados de salud basadas en el paciente en la práctica clínica. Rev Clín Med Fam. 2009;2(6):286–93.
Donabedian A. A conceptual exploration. In: The quality of medical care. The Mexican Medical Press México City. 1982;1-39.
Heuvel JF van den, Groenhof TK, Veerbeek JH, Solinge WW van, Lely AT, Franx A, et al. eHealth as the next-generation perinatal care: An overview of the literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2018;20(6):e202.
Hantsoo L, Criniti S, Khan A, Moseley M, Kincler N, Faherty LJ, et al. A mobile application for monitoring and management of depressed mood in a vulnerable pregnant population. Psychiatr Serv. 2018;69(1):104–7.
Aquino M, Munce S, Griffith J, Pakosh M, Munnery M, Seto E. Exploring the use of telemonitoring for patients at high risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in the antepartum and postpartum periods: Scoping review. JMIR MHealth UHealth. 2020;8(4):e15095.
Rigla M, Martínez-Sarriegui I, García-Sáez G, Pons B, Hernando ME. Gestational diabetes management using smart mobile telemedicine. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018;12(2):260–4.
Cairns AE, Tucker KL, Crawford C, McManus RJ, Powell J. Implementing self-management: A mixed methods study of women’s experiences of a postpartum hypertension intervention (SNAP-HT). Trials. 2020;21(1):508.
DeNicola N, Grossman D, Marko K, Sonalkar S, Butler Tobah YS, Ganju N, et al. Telehealth interventions to improve obstetric and gynecologic health outcomes. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020;135(2):371–82.
Lanssens D, Vandenberk T, Lodewijckx J, Peeters T, Storms V, Thijs IM, et al. Midwives’, obstetricians’, and recently delivered mothers’ perceptions of remote monitoring for prenatal care: Retrospective survey. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(4):e10887.
Alves DS, Times VC, da Silva ÉMA, Melo PSA, Novaes M de A. Advances in obstetric telemonitoring: A systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2020;134(104004):104004.
Obstetric Risk Classification. RISK 1 Low Risk [Internet]. Available from: https://aplicaciones.msp.gob.ec/salud/archivosdigitales/ANEXO%202%20-%20CLASIFICACI%C3%93N%20DE%20RIESGOS%20OBST%C3%89TRICOS.pdf
Ivey TL, Hughes D, Dajani NK, Magann EF. Antenatal management of at-risk pregnancies from a distance. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;55(1):87–9.
Larsen B, Micucci S, Hartman SJ, Ramos G. Feasibility, and acceptability of a counseling- and mHealth-based physical activity intervention for pregnant women with diabetes: The fit for two pilot study. JMIR MHealth UHealth. 2020;8(10):e18915.
Willcox JC, Wilkinson SA, Lappas M, Ball K, Crawford D, McCarthy EA, et al. A mobile health intervention promoting healthy gestational weight gain for women entering pregnancy at a high body mass index: the txt4two pilot randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2017;124(11):1718–28.
Bennett L, Rose D, Jackson A, Thomas S. Psychological and socio-medical aspects of HIV/AIDS: A reflection on publications in AIDS Care (1989-1995). AIDS Care. 1998;10(1):115–21.
Zhu X-H, Tao J, Jiang L-Y, Zhang Z-F. Role of usual healthcare combined with telemedicine in the management of high-risk pregnancy in Hangzhou, China. J Healthc Eng. 2019;2019:3815857.
Sun W, Yu L, Liu S, Chen Y, Chen J, Wen SW, et al. Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes for patients with placenta accreta spectrum between online-to-offline management model with standard care model. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2018;222:161–5.
van den Heuvel JFM, Ayubi S, Franx A, Bekker MN. Home-based monitoring and telemonitoring of complicated pregnancies: Nationwide cross-sectional survey of current practice in the Netherlands. JMIR MHealth UHealth. 2020;8(10):e18966.
Jeganathan S, Prasannan L, Blitz MJ, Vohra N, Rochelson B, Meirowitz N. Adherence, and acceptability of telehealth appointments for high-risk obstetrical patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;2(4):100233.
Ayatollahi H, Ghalandar Abadi M, Hemmat MWeb, and mobile-based technologies for monitoring high-risk pregnancies. BMJ Health & Care Informatics. 2019;26:e000025.
Jongsma KR, van den Heuvel JFM, Rake J, Bredenoord AL, Bekker MN. User experiences with and recommendations for mobile health technology for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: Mixed methods study. JMIR MHealth UHealth. 2020;8(8):e17271.
van den Heuvel JFM, Kariman SS, van Solinge WW, Franx A, Lely AT, Bekker MN. SAFE@HOME - Feasibility study of a telemonitoring platform combining blood pressure and preeclampsia symptoms in pregnancy care. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology. 2019;240:226–31.
van den Heuvel JFM, van Lieshout C, Franx A, Frederix G, Bekker MN. SAFE@HOME: Cost analysis of a new care pathway including a digital health platform for women at increased risk of preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2021;24:118–23.
Cairns AE, Tucker KL, Leeson P, Mackillop LH, Santos M, Velardo C, et al. Self-management of postnatal hypertension: The SNAP-HT trial. Hypertension. 2018;72(2):425–32.
Kalafat E, Mir I, Perry H, Thilaganathan B, Khalil A. Is home blood‐pressure monitoring in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy consistent with clinic recordings? Homevsclinic bloodpressure monitoring. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52(4):515–21.
Tucker KL, Taylor KS, Crawford C, Hodgkinson JA, Bankhead C, Carver T, et al. Blood pressure self-monitoring in pregnancy: examining feasibility in a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1): 1605-0.
Ganapathy R, Grewal A, Castleman JS. Remote monitoring of blood pressure to reduce the risk of preeclampsia related complications with an innovative use of mobile technology. Pregnancy Hypertension. 2016;6(4):263–5.
Pealing LM, Tucker KL, Mackillop LH, Crawford C, Wilson H, Nickless A, et al. A randomised controlled trial of blood pressure self-monitoring in the management of hypertensive pregnancy. OPTIMUM-BP: A feasibility trial. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2019;18:141–9.
Vandenberk T, Lanssens D, Storms V, Thijs IM, Bamelis L, Grieten L, et al. Relationship between adherence to remote monitoring and patient characteristics: Observational study in women with pregnancy-induced hypertension. JMIR MHealth UHealth. 2019;7(8):e12574.
Hoppe KK, Williams M, Thomas N, Zella JB, Drewry A, Kim K, et al. Telehealth with remote blood pressure monitoring for postpartum hypertension: A prospective single-cohort feasibility study. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2019;15:171–6.
Rhoads SJ, Serrano CI, Lynch CE, Ounpraseuth ST, Gauss CH, Payakachat N, et al. Exploring implementation of m-health monitoring in postpartum women with hypertension. Telemed J E Health. 2017;23(10):833–41.
Lanssens D, Vonck S, Vandenberk T, Schraepen C, Storms V, Thijs IM, et al. A prenatal remote monitoring program in pregnancies complicated with gestational hypertensive disorders: What are the contributors to the cost savings? Telemedicine Journal and E-Health. 2019;25(8):686–92.
Van den Heuvel JFM, Lely AT, Huisman JJ, Trappenburg JCA, Franx A, Bekker MN. SAFE@ HOME: Digital health platform facilitating a new care path for women at increased risk of preeclampsia-A case-control study. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2020;22:30–6.
Perry H, Sheehan E, Thilaganathan B, Khalil A. Home blood‐pressure monitoring in a hypertensive pregnant population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(4):524–30.
Thomas NA, Drewry A, Racine Passmore S, Assad N, Hoppe KK. Patient perceptions, opinions, and satisfaction of telehealth with remote blood pressure monitoring postpartum. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):153.
Mackillop L, Hirst JE, Bartlett KJ, Birks JS, Clifton L, Farmer AJ, et al. Comparing the efficacy of a mobile phone-based blood glucose management system with standard clinic care in women with gestational diabetes: Randomized controlled trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2018;6(3):e71.
Raman P, Shepherd E, Dowswell T, Middleton P, Crowther CA. Different methods, and settings for glucose monitoring for gestational diabetes during pregnancy. Cochrane Libr. 2017;2017(10): cd011069.
Jones LV, Ray A, Moy FM, Buckley BS. Techniques of monitoring blood glucose during pregnancy for women with pre-existing diabetes. Cochrane Libr. 2019;2019(6): cd009613.
Linden K, Berg M, Adolfsson A, Sparud-Lundin C. Person‐centred, web‐based support in pregnancy and early motherhood for women with Type 1 diabetes mellitus: A randomized controlled trial. Diabet Med. 2018;35(2):232–41.
Ming W-K, Mackillop LH, Farmer AJ, Loerup L, Bartlett K, Levy JC, et al. Telemedicine technologies for diabetes in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2016;18(11):e290.
Urquhart C, Currell R, Harlow F, Callow L. Home uterine monitoring for detecting preterm labour. Cochrane Libr. 2017;2017(2):cd006172.
Lanssens D, Vandenberk T, Thijs IM, Grieten L, Gyselaers W. Effectiveness of telemonitoring in obstetrics: Scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(9):e327.
Hossain MS, Muhammad G. Cloud-assisted Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) – Enabled framework for health monitoring. Comput Netw. 2016;101:192–202.
Duran Peñafiel A. Implementation of the TeleHealth Unit in the Ladera Health Network State Company of the Municipality of Santiago de Cali [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2022 Apr 21]. Available from: https://repository.icesi.edu.co/biblioteca_digital/bitstream/10906/78822/1/T00219.pdf