Conciencia social, representación semiótica y dibujo en la experiencia de los niños: tendencias teóricas y metodológicas
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Este artículo presenta una revisión de literatura que buscó identificar las tendencias teóricas y metodológicas en estudios sobre la relación entre conciencia social, representación semiótica y dibujo en la experiencia de los niños. Desde una posición crítica respecto al objeto, los sujetos y los enfoques de la investigación, se revisaron noventa y cinco artículos publicados entre 2005 y 2020. Se identificó que las teorías de representación social, estereotipos y mundos posibles son las más frecuentes; y que la investigación-acción participativa, estudios experimentales y estudios clínicos y terapéuticos son las metodologías más implementadas. El dibujo no se ha asumido desde una perspectiva interdisciplinar de las ciencias cognitivas ni con suficiencia desde una aproximación fenomenológica. Por lo tanto, se requiere estudiar la conciencia social en los niños desde la fenomenología del mundo social y el análisis semiótico.
Citas
Bajtín, M. (1976). El signo ideológico y la filosofía del lenguaje. Nueva Visión.
Berger, P. & Luckmann, T. (1966). La construcción social de la realidad. Amorrortu editores.
Carrara, C. (2010). The Endogenous Feedback Network: A new approach to the comprehensive study of consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 547-579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.03.007
Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The Draw-a-Scientist Test. Science Education, 67(2), 255-265. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730670213
Deco, G., Vidaurre, D. & Kringelbach, M. (2021). Revisiting the Global Workspace orchestrating the hierarchical organization of the human brain. Nature Human Behavior, 5, 497-511. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01003-6
Durkheim, É. (1999). Les règles de la méthode sociologique. Quadrige/Presses Universitaires de France.
Duszak, A. & Fairclough, N. (2008). Krytyczna Analiza Dyskursu. Interdyscyplinarne podejscie do komunikacji społecznej. Universitas.
Duval, R. (1999). Semiosis y pensamiento humano. Registros semióticos y aprendizajes intelectuales. Universidad del Valle.
Eaton, L., Doherty, K. & Widrick, R. (2007). A review of research and methods used to establish art therapy as an effective treatment method for traumatized children. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 34(3), 256-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2007.03.001
Eco, U. (2008). Decir casi lo mismo: la traducción como experiencia. Lumen.
Eco, U. (1980). Signo. Labor.
Fattore, T. & Fegter, S. (2017). Children, social class and social practices: A theoretical analysis of children’s practices of class distinction. Children and Youth Services Review, 97, 67-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.032
Friston, K., Rudrauf, D., Bennequin, D., Granic, I., Landini, G. & Williford, K. (2017). A mathematical model of embodied consciousness. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 428, 106-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.05.032
Galli, M., Vimercati, S., Stella, G., Caiazzo, G., Norveti, F., Onnis, F., Rigoldi, C. & Albertini, G. (2011). A new approach for the quantitative evaluation of drawings in children with learning disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 1004-1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.051
García, M., Villegas, M. y González, F. (2015). La noción del espacio en la primera infancia: un análisis desde los dibujos infantiles. Revista Paradigma, 36(2), 225-245. http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1011-22512015000200011
Gernhardt, A., Rübeling, H. & Keller, H. (2014). Self -and family- conceptions of Turkish migrant, native German, and native Turkish children: A comparison of children’s drawings. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 40, 154-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.12.005
Goldner, L. & Miri, M. (2014). Children’s family drawings, body perceptions, and eating attitudes: The moderating role of gender. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 41, 79-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2013.11.004
Goldner, L., Edelstein, M. & Habshush, Y. (2015). A glance at children’s family drawings: Associations with children’s and parents’ hope and attributional style. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 43, 7-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2015.02.006
Guerrero, S., Enesco, I., Lago, O. & Rodríguez, P. (2010). Preschool children’s understanding of racial cues in drawings and photographs. Cognitive Development, 25, 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.07.001
Güneş, S., Aysel, K. & Gülen, B. (2014). An Analysis of pre-school children’s perception of schoolyard through their drawings. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2105-2114. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.528
Hamama, L. & Ronen, T. (2009). Drawing as a self-report measurement. Child and Family Social Work, 14(1), 90-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2008.00585.x
Harmon, G. & Kaiser, D. (2015). The Bird’s Nest Drawing: A study of construct validity and interrater reliability. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 42, 1-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2014.12.008
Hartley, C. & Allen, M. (2015). Is children’s naming and drawing of pictures mediated by representational intentions? Evidence from typical development and autism. Cognitive Development, 36, 52-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2015.08.002
Hiles, A., Razuri, E., Call, C., DeLuna, J., Purvis, K. & Cross, D. (2016). Family Drawings as Attachment Representations in a Sample of Post-Institutionalized Adopted Children. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 52, 63-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2016.09.003
Holland, O. & Gamez, D. (2009). Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness. Elsevier Inc.
İlkörücü, Ş. & Tapan, M. (2010). Analyzing students’conceptualization through their drawings. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 2681-2684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.395
Izadkhah, Y. & Gibbs, L. (2015). A study of preschoolers’ perceptions of earthquakes through drawing. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 14, 132-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.06.002
Jung, J. & Kim, G. (2015). The use of a favourite kind of weather drawing as a discriminatory tool for children who have experienced physical abuse. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 43, 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2015.02.002
Karczmarzyk, M. (2012). A Child in the Culture of Silence? The Meaning and Communication in Children’s Drawings. Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 554-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.536
Katz, C., & Hershkowitz, I. (2010). The effects of drawing on children’s accounts of sexual abuse. Child Maltreatment, 15(2), 171-179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559509351742
Katz, C. & Hamama, L. (2013). “Draw me everything that happened to you”: Exploring children’s drawings of sexual abuse. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 877-882. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.02.007
Kim, J. & Suh, J. (2013). Children’s kinetic family drawings and their internalizing problem behaviors. The Arts of Psychotherapy, 40, 206-215.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2012.12.009
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. Routledge.
Kress, G. (2011). Discourse analysis and education: a multimodal social semiotic approach. En R. Rogers (Ed.). An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (pp. 205-226). Routledge.
Lee, E., Edelman, F., & Stafstrom, C. (2017). Evidence of Diplopia in Children’s Headache Drawings Helps to Differentiate Pseudotumor Cerebri from Migraine. Pediatric Neurology, 79, 40-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2017.10.020
Leone, M., Salles, A., Pulver, A., Golombek, D., & Sigman, M. (2018). Time drawings: Spatial representation of temporal concepts. Consciousness and Cognition, 59, 10-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.01.005
Ligorio, M., Schwartz, N., D’Aprile, G. & Philhour, D. (2017). Children’s representations of learning through drawings. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 12, 133-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.12.004
Madsen, J. (2013). Collaboration and learning with drawing as a tool. Teaching and Teacher
Education, 34, 154-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.04.001
Matto, H., Naglieri, J. & Clausen, C. (2005). Validity of the Draw-APerson: Screening Procedure for Emotional Disturbance (DAP: SPED) in strengths-based assessment. Research on Social Work Practice, 15, 41-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731504269553
Moragón, F. y Martínez, V. (2016). Juegos de niñas y juegos de niños: estudio sobre la representación del juego infantil a través del dibujo. Revista Educación, 40(1), 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v40i1.17439
Molina, A. (2015). El dibujo infantil: Trazos, colores e historias que nos hacen reflexionar y aprender. Educare, 19(1), 167-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.15359/ree.19-1.10
Morra, S. & Panesi, S. (2017). From scribbling to drawing: the role of working memory. Cognitive Development, 43, 142-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.03.001
Moscovici, S. (2005). Memória, imaginário e representações sociais. Museu da República.
Moschini, L. (2005). Drawing the Line: Art Therapy with the Difficult Client. John Wiley.
Otake, S., Treiman, R. & Yin, L. (2017). Differentiation of writing and drawing by U.S. two to five-year olds. Cognitive Development, 43, 119-128.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.03.004
Pace, C., Zavattini, G. & Tambelli, R. (2015). Does family drawing assess attachment representations of late‐adopted children? A preliminary report. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 20(1), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12042
Panesi, S. & Morra, S. (2016). Drawing a dog: The role of working memory and executive function. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 152, 1-11. Elsevier Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.06.015
Peirce, C. S. (2006). Nomenclatura y divisiones de las relaciones triádicas, hasta donde están determinadas. (Benitti, M.F., Trad.). https://www.unav.es/gep/RelacionesTriadicas.html
Pinto, G., Gamanossi, B. & Cameron, C. (2011). From scribbles to meanings: Social interactions in different cultures and emergence of young children’s early drawing. Early Child Development and Care, 181(4), 425-444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03004430903442001
Procaccia, R., Veronese, G. & Castiglioni, M. (2014). The Impact of Attachment Style on the Family Drawings of School-Aged Children. The Open Psychology Journal, 7, 9-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874350101407010009
Quaglia, R., Longobardi, C., Iotti, N. & Prino, L. (2015). A new theory on children’s drawings: Analyzing the role of emotion and movement in graphical development. Infant Behavior & Development, 39, 81-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2015.02.009
Racheli, L. & Tova, Y. (2011). Using human figure drawing as a tool for examining self-perception and emotional attitudes among Jewish and Arab children in Israel. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35, 567-579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.04.003
Ricoeur, P. (2008). Tiempo y Narración II. Configuración del tiempo en el relato de ficción. Siglo XXI.
Ricoeur, P. (2009). Tiempo y Narración III. El tiempo narrado. Siglo XXI.
Riggs, K.J., Jolley, R.P. & Simpson, A. (2013). The role of inhibitory control in the development of human figure drawing in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114, 537-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.10.003
Robbins, P. (2008). Consciousness and the social mind. Cognitive Systems Research, 9, 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2007.07.005
Ruiz, I. & Escalas, M. (2012). Scientists Seen by Children: A Case Study in Catalonia, Spain. Science Communication, 34(4), 520-545. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547011429199
Samaras, G., Bonoti, F. & Christidou, V. (2012). Exploring children’s perceptions of scientists through drawings and interviews. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1541-1546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.337
Saneei, A. & Haghayegh, S. (2011). Family drawings of Iranian children with autism and their family members. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 38, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2011.09.004
Sharpe, J. & Izadkhah, Y. (2014). Use of comic strips in teaching earthquake to kindergarten children. Disaster Prevention and Managment, 23(2), 138-156. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-05-2013-0083
Shi-xu (2006). Mind, self, and consciousness as discourse. New Ideas in Psychology, 24, 63-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2006.06.003
Schütz, A. (1972). Fenomenología del mundo social. Introducción a la sociología comprensiva. Paidós.
Snir, S., & Wiseman, H. (2016). Couples’ joint drawing patterns: Associations with self-report measures of interpersonal patterns and attachment styles. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 48, 28-37. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.aip.2015.12.006
Tchanturia, K., Dolidze, K. & Smith, E. (2013). A Clinical Tool for Evaluating Emotional Well- Being: Self-Drawings of Hospitalized Children. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 28, 470-478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2013.02.026
Toates, F. (2006). A model of the hierarchy of behaviour, cognition, and consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 75-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2005.04.008
Treiman, R. & Yin, L. (2011). Early differentiation between drawing and writing in Chinese children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 786-801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.08.013
Uribe, N. (2013). Concepciones psicoanalíticas del dibujo en la clínica con niños. Affectio Societatis, 10(19), 48-59. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1491015521
Valderrama, L., Vernal, T. & Méndez, L. (2016). Representación Infantil de la Ciencia usando el Test Dibujando un Científico (DAST). Posibilidades de Cambios desde la Comunicación Científica. Información Tecnológica, 27(6), 203-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642016000600021
Van Dijk, T. (2009). Discurso y poder. Contribuciones a los estudios críticos del discurso. Gedisa.
Vygotsky, L. (1995). Pensamiento y lenguaje. Paidós.
Yousefian, O., Ballantyne, A., Doo, A. & Trauner, D. (2015). Clock Drawing in Children with Perinatal Stroke. Pediatric Neurology, 52, 592-598.