Kant and the Question of Moral Judgment in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Main Article Content

Eduardo Alberto León
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0137-6291

Abstract

This article analyzes the possibility of attributing moral agency to artificial intelligence (AI) from a Kantian perspective. It argues that although AI systems can simulate ethical behavior through preprogrammed algorithms and rules, they lack transcendental freedom and autonomous will, which are essential conditions for Kantian morality. The study combines key concepts of practical philosophy –such as duty and the categorical imperative– with exploratory experiments illustrating AI responses to moral dilemmas. Findings show that machine actions are amoral, as they are limited to external ends determined by human programmers. The article concludes that Kantian ethics provides a critical framework to highlight the limits of artificial moral agency and emphasizes the need for a human-centered approach in AI development.

Keywords:
kantian ethics, moral judgment, artificial intelligence, autonomy, categorical imperative

References

Argandoña, Antonio. “Ética e inteligencia artificial”. EUNOMÍA. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad, no. 27 (2023): 137-54. https://e-revistas.uc3m.es/index.php/EUNOM/article/download/9004/6752

Asimov, Isaac. Yo, robot. Traducido por L. G. Prado. Barcelona: Edhasa, 2009.

Awad, Edmond, Sohan Dsouza, Richard Kim, Jonathan Schulz, Joseph Henrich, Azim Shariff, Jean-François Bonnefon & Iyad Rahwan. “The Moral Machine Experiment”. Nature, Vol. 563, no. 7729 (2018): 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6

Bostrom, Nick. Superinteligencia: Caminos, peligros, estrategias. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.

Coeckelbergh, Mark. Ética de la inteligencia artificial. Madrid: Cátedra, 2021.

De Lucas Gil, Julio. “¿Agentes artificiales morales? Consideraciones éticas a propósito de la inteligencia artificial” (Trabajo de fin de grado, Universidad de Alicante, 2024). https://rua.ua.es/dspace/handle/10045/144143

Espinoza Freire, Eudaldo Enrique y Daniel Xavier Calva Nagua. “La ética en las investigaciones educativas”. Revista Universidad y Sociedad, Vol. 12, no. 4 (2020): 333-40.

Kant, Immanuel. Crítica de la razón pura. Traducido por Pedro Ribas. Madrid: Taurus, 2005.

_____. Fundamentación de la metafísica de las costumbres. Traducido por M. García Morente. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe, 2007.

_____. Crítica de la razón práctica. Traducido por J. M. Palacios. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 2008.

Kurzweil, Ray. The Singularity is Near. New York: The Viking Press, 2005.

McFarland, Matt. “Elon Musk: ‘with Artificial Intelligence We Are Summoning the Demon’”. The Washington Post, October 24, 2014. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/innovations/wp/2014/10/24/elon-musk-with-artificial-intelligence-we-are-summoning-the-demon/

Montes, Nieves, Nardine Osman, Carles Sierra & Marija Slavkovik. “Value Engineering for Autonomous Agents”. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.08759

Murillo, José Ignacio. “¿Necesita ética el posthumanismo? La normatividad de una naturaleza abierta”. Cuadernos de Bioética, Vol. 25, no. 3 (2014).

Powers, Thomas. The Morality of Machine Intelligence. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2006.

_____. On the Moral Agency of Computers. Topoi, 2013.

Serafim, Mauricio-C., Ana Bertoncini, Maria-Clara Ames y Deividi Pansera. “Inteligencia artificial (de)generativa: sobre la imposibilidad de que un sistema de IA tenga una experiencia moral”. Scripta Theologica, Vol. 56, no. 2 (2024): 467-502. https://doi.org/10.15581/006.56.2.467-502

Tegmark, Max. Life 3.0. New York: Knopf, 2017.

Zetina Gutiérrez, Humberto. “Kant y los límites de la inteligencia artificial”. Universitaria, Vol. 7, no. 48 (2024): 36-38. https://revistauniversitaria.uaemex.mx/article/view/22699