Modelos normativos de privacidad en las ciudades inteligentes
Barra lateral del artículo
Descargas
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Las ciudades inteligentes se presentan como el futuro del desarrollo urbano, utilizando sensores, tecnologías IoT, macrodatos y servicios en nube para mejorar el nivel de vida de los ciudadanos. En este tipo de entorno los datos personales de los ciudadanos son uno de los engranajes fundamentales que permite el correcto funcionamiento de la ciudad. Aunado a esto, la empresa privada juega un rol importante en la administración de la ciudad y los datos de los ciudadanos. Sin embargo, los modelos normativos de privacidad, con su énfasis en un consentimiento informado, no están diseñados para atender los desafíos de una ciudad completamente conectada. Este artículo se enfoca en los desafíos inherentes a los modelos de privacidad tradicionales en el contexto de las ciudades inteligentes.
Citas
Alexopoulos, C.; Pereira, G. V.: Charalabidis, Y.; y Madrid, L. (2019). A taxonomy of smart cities initiatives. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/3326365.3326402
Angelidou, M. (2014). Smart city policies: A spatial approach. Cities, 41, S3–S11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.06.007
Balkin, J. (2016). Information Fiduciaries and the First Amendment. UC Davis Law Review, 49, 1183–1234.
Balkin, J. (2017). The Three Laws of Robotics in the Age of Big Data. Ohio State Law Journal, 78, 1217–1241.
Balkin, J. (2020). The Fiduciary Model of Privacy. Harvard Law Review Forum, 134, 11–33.
Cabezuelo-Lorenzo, F.; Bonete-Vizcaíno, F.; y Sánchez-Martínez, M. (2016). Análisis de la información y documentación científica española sobre el fenómeno de las smart cities, el hábitat de los nativos digitales. Cuadernos de Documentación Multimedia. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_cdmu.2016.v27.n1.53000
Choi, H.; Park, J.; y Jung, Y. (2018). The role of privacy fatigue in online privacy behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.001
Cohen, J. E. (2013). What privacy is for. Harvard Law Review, 126, 1904–1933.
Dameri, R. P. (2017). Smart City Implementation : Creating Economic and Public Value in Innovative Urban Systems. In Progress in IS,.
Directorate-General for Internal Policies. (2015). A Comparison between US and EU Data Protection Legislation for Law Enforcement. Study for the LIBE Committee.
Edwards, L. (2016). Privacy, Security and Data Protection in Smart Cities: a Critical EU Law Perspective. European Data Protection Law Review, 2(1), 28–58.
Finch, K.; y Tene, O. (2014). Welcome to the Metropticon: Protecting Privacy in a Hyperconnected Town. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 41, 1581–1615.
Geffray, E.; y Auby, J. B. (2017). The political and legal consequences of smart cities. Field Actions Science Report, Special Issue 16, 11–15.
Harrison, C.; y Donnelly, I. A. (2011). A theory of smart cities. 55th Annual Meeting of the International Society for the Systems Sciences 2011.
Hofkirchner, W. (2010). A taxonomy of theories about ICTs and society. TripleC. https:// doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v8i2.156
Jameson, S.; Richter, C.; y Taylor, L. (2019). People’s strategies for perceived surveillance in Amsterdam Smart City. Urban Geography, 40, 1467–1484. https://doi.org/10.10 80/02723638.2019.1614369
Joh, E. E. (2019). Policing the smart city. In International Journal of Law in Context. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552319000107
Kastrenakes, J. (2013). Google’s chief internet evangelist says “privacy may actually be an anomaly” - The Verge. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2013/11/20/5125922/ vint-cerf-google-internet-evangelist-says-privacy-may-be-anomaly
Keith, M. J.; Evans, C. M.; Lowry, P. B.; y Babb, J. S. (2014). Privacy fatigue: The effect of privacy control complexity on consumer electronic information disclosure. 35th International Conference on Information Systems “Building a Better World Through Information Systems”, ICIS 2014.
Keymolen, E.; y Voorwinden, A. (2020). Can we negotiate? Trust and the rule of law in the smart city paradigm. International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, 34, 233–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2019.1588844
Khan, L. M.; y Pozen, D. E. (2019). A skeptical view of information fiduciaries. Harvard Law Review, 133, 497–541.
Kitchin, R. (2014). The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 79(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8
Kostakis, V.; y Bauwens, M. (2014). Network society and future scenarios for a collaborative economy. In Network Society and Future Scenarios for a Collaborative Economy. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137406897
Kostka, G. (2019). China’s social credit systems and public opinion: explaining high levels of approval. New Media y Society, 21(7), 1565–1593.
Lee, S. K.; Kwon, H. R.; Cho, H.; Kim, J.; y Lee, D. (2016). International Case Studies of Smart Cities Songdo, Republic of Korea.
Losavio, M. M.; Chow, K. P.; Koltay, A.; y James, J. (2018). The Internet of Things and the Smart City: Legal challenges with digital forensics, privacy, and security. Security and Privacy, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/spy2.23
Niaros, V. (2016). Introducing a taxonomy of the “smart city”: Towards a commons- oriented approach. TripleC. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v14i1.718
Nimmer, M. (1954). The Right of Publicity. Law and Contemporary Problems, 19, 203–223. Poon, L. (2018). Sleepy in Songdo, Korea’s Smartest City. Bloomberg. https://www. bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-22/songdo-south-korea-s-smartest-city-
is-lonely
Rodriguez Samudio, R. (2019). La privacidad en las ciudades inteligentes. CES Derecho, 10(2), 675–695.
Sadowski, J.; y Bendor, R. (2019). Selling Smartness: Corporate Narratives and the Smart City as a Sociotechnical Imaginary. Science Technology and Human Values, 44(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243918806061
Schermer, B. W.; Custers, B.; y van der Hof, S. (2014). The crisis of consent: How stronger legal protection may lead to weaker consent in data protection. Ethics and Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-014-9343-8
Shelton, T.; Zook, M.; y Wiig, A. (2015). The “actually existing smart city.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/ rsu026
Solove, D. (2013). Privacy Self-Management and the Consent Paradox. Harvard Law Review.
Solove, D. J. (2013). Introduction: Privacy self-management and the consent dilemma.
Harvard Law Review, 126, 1880–1903.
Tene, O. (2013, November 22). Vint Cerf is Wrong. Privacy Is Not An Anomaly | Center for Internet and Society. The Center for Internet and Society. http://cyberlaw.stanford. edu/publications/vint-cerf-wrong-privacy-not-anomaly
U.S. Department of Health Education y Wellfare. (1973). Record computers and the rights of citizens. justice.gov/opcl/docs/rec-com-rights.pdf
van Zoonen, L. (2016). Privacy concerns in smart cities. Government Information Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.06.004
Walden, I.; y Noto La Diega, G. (2016). Contracting for the “Internet of Things”: looking into the Nest. European Journal of Law and Technology.
Warren, K. (2021, February 24). What Toyota’s 175-acre smart city in Japan will look like: Photos. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/toyota-city-of-the-future-japan-mt-fuji-2020-1
Warren, S. D.; y Louis D, B. (1890). The Right to Privacy. Harvard Law Review, 5(5), 193–220.
Whitman, J. Q. (2004). The two western cultures of privacy: Dignity versus liberty. Yale Law Journal, 113, 1151–1221. https://doi.org/10.2307/4135723
Woo, J. (2017). Smart Cities Pose Privacy Risks and Other Problems, But that Doesn’t Mean We Shouldn’t Build Them. University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, 85, 953–971.
Wu, Y.; Lau, T.; Atkin, D. J.; y Lin, C. A. (2011). A comparative study of online privacy regulations in the U.S. and China. Telecommunications Policy, 35(7), 603–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2011.05.002
Yang, F.; y Xu, J. (2018). Privacy concerns in China’s smart city campaign: The deficit of China’s Cybersecurity Law. Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, 5, 533–543. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.246